본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Barriers and interventions to improve the uptake of cancer risk management strategies in hereditary cancer syndromes: a narrative review.

리뷰 1/5 보강
International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society 📖 저널 OA 9.4% 2024: 2/2 OA 2025: 0/8 OA 2026: 3/41 OA 2024~2026 2026 Vol.36(1) p. 102825
Retraction 확인
출처

Beshar I, Agusti N, Barajas K, Krause K, Nitecki Wilke R, Rauh-Hain JA

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Risk-reduction guidelines for patients with germline pathogenic variants, such as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, are effective and significantly r

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Beshar I, Agusti N, et al. (2026). Barriers and interventions to improve the uptake of cancer risk management strategies in hereditary cancer syndromes: a narrative review.. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 36(1), 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102825
MLA Beshar I, et al.. "Barriers and interventions to improve the uptake of cancer risk management strategies in hereditary cancer syndromes: a narrative review.." International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, vol. 36, no. 1, 2026, pp. 102825.
PMID 41494213 ↗

Abstract

Risk-reduction guidelines for patients with germline pathogenic variants, such as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, are effective and significantly reduce mortality when implemented. Despite this, uptake of risk-reduction strategies is notably low, especially among medically under-served populations. Barriers to the completion of cancer surveillance, risk-reducing surgical interventions, and chemoprevention are complex and occur at every level in the health care system. In this narrative review article, systematic, clinical, and patient-level barriers to completion of guidelines are described and outlined. In addition, interventions that have emerged to improve the uptake of these interventions are addressed and evaluated for efficacy. These interventions group in 4 main arenas: technologic platforms, multi-disciplinary clinics, decision aids, and psychological support. We comment on the long-term sustainability of these interventions, particularly, in under-served populations and low- to middle-income countries, and highlight areas of impact. We also outline areas of focus for possible future directions and mechanisms for ensuring interventions are equitable, holistic, and rigorously assessed for efficacy.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반