본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

EHealth intervention for quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 📖 저널 OA 41.4% 2023: 3/4 OA 2024: 6/8 OA 2025: 30/56 OA 2026: 37/113 OA 2023~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

Pimentel-Parra GA, Soto-Ruiz N, Escalada-Hernández P, San Martín-Rodríguez L, García-Vivar C

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Digital health interventions have shown promise for improving quality of life, especially in the short term after treatment.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 102
  • 95% CI -0.10 to 0.32

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Pimentel-Parra GA, Soto-Ruiz N, et al. (2026). EHealth intervention for quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial.. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag020
MLA Pimentel-Parra GA, et al.. "EHealth intervention for quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial.." Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2026.
PMID 41581214 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Digital health interventions have shown promise for improving quality of life, especially in the short term after treatment. However, evidence regarding long-term breast cancer survivors (LT-BCSs; disease free >5 years) remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an eHealth intervention targeting health promotion and late sequelae management to improve LT-BCSs' quality of life.

[METHODS] In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 201 LT-BCSs (mean 11 years posttreatment) were randomly assigned to an interventio group (n = 102) using the CUMACA-M mobile application with specific health advice and recommendations for LT-BCSs, or a control group (n = 99) receiving usual care. Quality of life was measured with the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors scale (QOL-CS) at baseline and after 3 months. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat approach using t-tests, nonparametric tests, and effect sizes.

[RESULTS] At three months, no statistically or clinically significant differences between the groups in the overall quality of life score (QOL-CS) were found (difference of differences = 0.11; 95% CI -0.10 to 0.32; p = .303). In the intervention group, a small intragroup decrease in spiritual well-being was observed -0.25 (-0.49 to -0.02), of uncertain clinical significance; no significant differences between groups were detected.

[CONCLUSIONS] This eHealth intervention did not improve the quality of life of LT-BCSs, suggesting that more personalized, interactive, or professionally supported strategies may be needed. Future research should evaluate the long-term outcomes and effectiveness of hybrid or personalized digital strategies in this population.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05322460; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05322460.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반