Enhancing urine cytopathology with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance urine cytopathology for detecting urothelial carcinoma (UC), emphasizing improvements in diagnostic sensitivity, accura
- Sensitivity 63%
- Specificity 61.8%
- 연구 설계 systematic review
APA
Nabiyouni F, Chiou PZ (2026). Enhancing urine cytopathology with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.. American journal of clinical pathology, 165(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf135
MLA
Nabiyouni F, et al.. "Enhancing urine cytopathology with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.." American journal of clinical pathology, vol. 165, no. 2, 2026.
PMID
41643205
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance urine cytopathology for detecting urothelial carcinoma (UC), emphasizing improvements in diagnostic sensitivity, accuracy, and efficiency, as well as potential reductions in pathologist workload.
[METHODS] A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect were searched (January 2018 to July 2025) for English-language studies applying AI to urine cytology for UC detection and reporting sensitivity and specificity.
[RESULTS] Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 116 to 2641 cases. The AI models, predominantly convolutional neural networks, achieved a sensitivity of 63% to 100% and a specificity of 61.8% to 100% for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) detection. Artificial intelligence has the potential to improve detection and streamline workflows in clinical settings.
[CONCLUSIONS] Artificial intelligence shows strong potential as a diagnostic aid in urine cytopathology, particularly for HGUC detection, by improving accuracy and efficiency. However, challenges such as standardizing its use in different settings remain, along with the need for further large-scale validation studies.
[METHODS] A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect were searched (January 2018 to July 2025) for English-language studies applying AI to urine cytology for UC detection and reporting sensitivity and specificity.
[RESULTS] Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 116 to 2641 cases. The AI models, predominantly convolutional neural networks, achieved a sensitivity of 63% to 100% and a specificity of 61.8% to 100% for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) detection. Artificial intelligence has the potential to improve detection and streamline workflows in clinical settings.
[CONCLUSIONS] Artificial intelligence shows strong potential as a diagnostic aid in urine cytopathology, particularly for HGUC detection, by improving accuracy and efficiency. However, challenges such as standardizing its use in different settings remain, along with the need for further large-scale validation studies.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Urologic Neoplasms; Urine; Sensitivity and Specificity; Cytodiagnosis; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell