Overall survival with abemaciclib in early breast cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
5637 patients underwent randomization, with 2808 assigned to abemaciclib-ET, and 2829 to ET.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
ET for at least 5 years with or without abemaciclib for 2 years
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Adjuvant abemaciclib-ET resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared with ET in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk EBC. At 7 years, abemaciclib-ET continued to demonstrate a sustained IDFS and DRFS benefit.
[BACKGROUND] Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal gro
- p-value P = 0.027
- 95% CI 0.657-0.820
- 추적기간 76.2 months
APA
Johnston S, Martin M, et al. (2026). Overall survival with abemaciclib in early breast cancer.. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 37(2), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.10.005
MLA
Johnston S, et al.. "Overall survival with abemaciclib in early breast cancer.." Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, vol. 37, no. 2, 2026, pp. 155-165.
PMID
41110697
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). The impact on overall survival (OS) remained unknown.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] In the phase III monarchE trial (NCT03155997), patients received ET for at least 5 years with or without abemaciclib for 2 years. In this article, we report the primary OS results, a key secondary endpoint, and updated estimates of IDFS and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS).
[RESULTS] Overall, 5637 patients underwent randomization, with 2808 assigned to abemaciclib-ET, and 2829 to ET. In the intent-to-treat population, with a median follow-up of 76.2 months, abemaciclib-ET resulted in a 15.8% lower risk of death than ET [661 deaths; hazard ratio 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.722-0.981, P = 0.027], meeting the prespecified boundary for significance. The 7-year OS was 86.8% with abemaciclib-ET and 85.0% with ET (absolute difference, 1.8%). OS benefit was consistent across prespecified subgroups. In addition to patients who had already died of metastatic disease, fewer patients in the abemaciclib-ET arm were living with metastatic disease compared with the ET arm (6.4% versus 9.4%). Sustained improvement was demonstrated in IDFS and DRFS (hazard ratio 0.734, 95% CI 0.657-0.820 and hazard ratio 0.746, 95% CI 0.662-0.840, respectively). Seven-year IDFS was 77.4% with abemaciclib-ET and 70.9% with ET (absolute difference, 6.5%) and 7-year DRFS were 80.0% and 74.9% (absolute difference, 5.1%). The long-term safety data compiled did not support any concerns of delayed toxicities.
[CONCLUSIONS] Adjuvant abemaciclib-ET resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared with ET in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk EBC. At 7 years, abemaciclib-ET continued to demonstrate a sustained IDFS and DRFS benefit.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] In the phase III monarchE trial (NCT03155997), patients received ET for at least 5 years with or without abemaciclib for 2 years. In this article, we report the primary OS results, a key secondary endpoint, and updated estimates of IDFS and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS).
[RESULTS] Overall, 5637 patients underwent randomization, with 2808 assigned to abemaciclib-ET, and 2829 to ET. In the intent-to-treat population, with a median follow-up of 76.2 months, abemaciclib-ET resulted in a 15.8% lower risk of death than ET [661 deaths; hazard ratio 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.722-0.981, P = 0.027], meeting the prespecified boundary for significance. The 7-year OS was 86.8% with abemaciclib-ET and 85.0% with ET (absolute difference, 1.8%). OS benefit was consistent across prespecified subgroups. In addition to patients who had already died of metastatic disease, fewer patients in the abemaciclib-ET arm were living with metastatic disease compared with the ET arm (6.4% versus 9.4%). Sustained improvement was demonstrated in IDFS and DRFS (hazard ratio 0.734, 95% CI 0.657-0.820 and hazard ratio 0.746, 95% CI 0.662-0.840, respectively). Seven-year IDFS was 77.4% with abemaciclib-ET and 70.9% with ET (absolute difference, 6.5%) and 7-year DRFS were 80.0% and 74.9% (absolute difference, 5.1%). The long-term safety data compiled did not support any concerns of delayed toxicities.
[CONCLUSIONS] Adjuvant abemaciclib-ET resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared with ET in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk EBC. At 7 years, abemaciclib-ET continued to demonstrate a sustained IDFS and DRFS benefit.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
- Humans
- Female
- Breast Neoplasms
- Benzimidazoles
- Aminopyridines
- Middle Aged
- Adult
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Aged
- Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
- Chemotherapy
- Adjuvant
- Follow-Up Studies
- Disease-Free Survival
- abemaciclib
- adjuvant therapy
- high-risk early breast cancer
- monarchE
- overall survival