본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Cognitive Impairment and Chemoendocrine vs Endocrine Therapy in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: A Secondary Analysis of the RxPONDER Randomized Clinical Trial.

1/5 보강
JAMA oncology 2026 Vol.12(2) p. 159-166
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 4/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
568 patients who completed the baseline questionnaire and were included in the analysis, 139 (24%) were premenopausal (median [range] age, 47.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Cognitive Impairment and Chemoendocrine
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
Endocrine Therapy in Pre
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Interventions to prevent or treat CRCI are needed to improve the long-term quality of life of these patients treated with chemotherapy. [TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01272037.

Kang IM, Forschmiedt JK, Loch MM, Lew DL, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, Meric-Bernstam F, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Lin NU, Perez EA, Goldstein LJ, Rastogi P, Schott AF, Baehner R, Sharma P, Tripathy D, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Kalinsky K, Henry NL

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[IMPORTANCE] Breast cancer treatment is associated with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P = .01
  • p-value P = .003
  • 95% CI -5.33 to -0.72

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Kang IM, Forschmiedt JK, et al. (2026). Cognitive Impairment and Chemoendocrine vs Endocrine Therapy in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: A Secondary Analysis of the RxPONDER Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA oncology, 12(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.5220
MLA Kang IM, et al.. "Cognitive Impairment and Chemoendocrine vs Endocrine Therapy in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: A Secondary Analysis of the RxPONDER Randomized Clinical Trial.." JAMA oncology, vol. 12, no. 2, 2026, pp. 159-166.
PMID 41379459

Abstract

[IMPORTANCE] Breast cancer treatment is associated with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). However, the association of endocrine therapy (ET) vs chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (CET) with CRCI is poorly understood.

[OBJECTIVE] To compare patient-reported CRCI between women with breast cancer treated with ET vs CET and to consider whether menopausal status may be associated.

[DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS] This was a prespecified secondary analysis of RxPONDER (SWOG S1007), a multinational phase 3 randomized clinical trial of more than 5000 women with hormone receptor-positive ERBB2-negative (formerly HER2-negative) breast cancer with 1 to 3 involved lymph nodes and Oncotype DX (21-gene recurrence score) of 25 or less. Participants were enrolled from February 2011 to September 2017, with results first reported in December 2020. Participants were randomly assigned to CET or ET, with ongoing follow-up. This secondary analysis assessed cognitive function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Perceived Cognitive Function Concerns (PCF) questionnaire at baseline, 6, 12, and 36 months. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2025.

[INTERVENTION] Random assignment to CET or ET.

[MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES] Mean PCF standardized (T) scores by menopausal status over time using generalized estimating equations analysis for continuous outcomes.

[RESULTS] Of the 568 patients who completed the baseline questionnaire and were included in the analysis, 139 (24%) were premenopausal (median [range] age, 47.8 [28.0-56.3] years) and 429 (76%) were postmenopausal (median [range] age, 62.3 [37.3-87.6] years). Among the 274 (48%) who received CET and the 294 (52%) who received ET alone, CET was determined to have a greater negative association with patient-reported CRCI in both the pre- and postmenopausal participants during the 36-month follow-up. In the ET alone group, PCF scores for premenopausal participants decreased from baseline to 6 and 12 months (53.53, 51.51, and 51.72, respectively) but recovered to baseline (54.36) at 36 months. For postmenopausal participants, mean PCF scores were essentially stable (51.72, 51.13, 51.11, and 51.70, respectively); however, in the CET group, PCF scores for both pre- and postmenopausal participants decreased from baseline to 6 and 12 months (premenopausal, 52.84, 49.27, 48.04; postmenopausal, 50.65, 48.39, 47.13, respectively) and did not return to baseline at 36 months (premenopausal, 49.25; postmenopausal, 48.44). The difference in longitudinal mean PCF scores over time between CET and ET groups was -3.02 (95% CI, -5.33 to -0.72; P = .01) for premenopausal and -2.37 (95% CI, -3.92 to -0.82; P = .003) for postmenopausal participants.

[CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE] This secondary analysis of the RxPONDER found that CET had a greater negative association with patient-reported CRCI compared to ET alone in both pre- and postmenopausal participants over a 36-month follow-up period. Interventions to prevent or treat CRCI are needed to improve the long-term quality of life of these patients treated with chemotherapy.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01272037.

MeSH Terms

Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Cognitive Dysfunction; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Postmenopause; Premenopause