본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Predictors of readmission after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
International journal of surgery (London, England) 📖 저널 OA 67.5% 2021: 0/3 OA 2022: 0/6 OA 2023: 9/9 OA 2024: 53/53 OA 2025: 129/222 OA 2026: 185/242 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.112(2) p. 4925-4937
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
948 participants were included, with a pooled readmission rate of 16.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Neoadjuvant therapy may have potential benefits on unplanned readmission. By identifying modifiable risk factors, future optimization of health outcomes and preventive measures can be achieved.

Khaw SP, Jabar H, Fong YB, Kueh MTW, Saxena K, Tan SH

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Esophageal cancer represents a major global health challenge.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P = 0.02
  • p-value P < 0.004
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Khaw SP, Jabar H, et al. (2026). Predictors of readmission after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. International journal of surgery (London, England), 112(2), 4925-4937. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003860
MLA Khaw SP, et al.. "Predictors of readmission after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.." International journal of surgery (London, England), vol. 112, no. 2, 2026, pp. 4925-4937.
PMID 41247924 ↗

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Esophageal cancer represents a major global health challenge. Multimodality treatment, involving esophagectomy with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy, remains the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancers.

[OBJECTIVES] Unplanned hospital readmission has emerged as a key indicator of surgical quality and long-term patient outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery. This meta-analysis aims to provide a comprehensive review of predictors of unplanned readmission following esophagectomy.

[METHODS] A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A literature search for studies reporting readmission following esophagectomy up to November 2024 was conducted for PubMed and Embase. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported for the risk factors in question. Random-effects meta-analysis models were applied accordingly.

[RESULTS] A total of 43 studies with 164 948 participants were included, with a pooled readmission rate of 16.4%. Comorbidities, particularly diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiovascular disease, were associated with increased risk of readmission. A higher risk of readmission was also observed among women [OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.02, 1.23) P = 0.02]. Both higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) (III/IV) and longer length of index stay (>10 days) were important indicators of higher readmission rates [OR 2.27 (1.05, 4.89), P < 0.004] and [OR 1.35 (1.14, 1.61), P < 0.0007]. In contrast, neoadjuvant therapy was a protective factor for readmission [0.74 (95% CI 0.59, 0.92) P = 0.008]. Postoperative complications, especially anastomotic leak, wound-related, pulmonary, and thromboembolic events, were associated with readmission. Readmission was not significantly associated with mortality [OR 1.65 (95% CI 0.82, 3.33), P = 0.16].

[CONCLUSION] This review provides a comprehensive overview of readmission after esophageal cancer surgery, a major indicator fof quality care. Our findings identified several potential risk factors of readmission following esophagectomy. These included comorbidities, ASA III/IV status, postoperative complications, and prolonged hospital stay. Neoadjuvant therapy may have potential benefits on unplanned readmission. By identifying modifiable risk factors, future optimization of health outcomes and preventive measures can be achieved.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반