Androgen receptor as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
메타분석
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
17329 patients were included.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Standardized AR evaluation and prospective studies are needed to confirm its prognostic and predictive value for personalized BC treatment.
[BACKGROUND] Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death among women globally.
- 95% CI 0.18-1.95
- HR 0.59
APA
Pal M, Chakrawal A, et al. (2026). Androgen receptor as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 218, 105112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105112
MLA
Pal M, et al.. "Androgen receptor as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.." Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, vol. 218, 2026, pp. 105112.
PMID
41490872 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death among women globally. The androgen receptor (AR), a nuclear receptor, exhibits both pro- and anti-tumorigenic effects, but its prognostic value in BC remains unclear.
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the association between AR expression and clinical outcomes like disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in BC across different subtypes.
[METHODS] This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD4251023927) and follows PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria encompassed original studies with female patients, survival data based on AR status, and at least one additional clinicopathological marker (e.g., ER, PR, HER2, TNBC). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistics.
[RESULTS] Twenty-four studies with 17329 patients were included. In multivariate analysis, AR positivity showed a trend towards better OS (HR=0.59, 95 % CI: 0.18-1.95, p = 0.39) and DFS (HR=0.62, 95 % CI: 0.30-1.25, p = 0.18), though not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis showed significant benefits in AR and ER-positive BC for both OS (HR=0.66, 95 % CI: 0.56-0.77) and DFS (HR=0.78, 95 % CI: 0.60-1.02), while it was ambiguous in other subsets.
[CONCLUSION] AR expression is associated with improved prognosis in ER-positive BC, but its role in TNBC and HER2-positive BC remains unclear due to heterogeneity and non-significant results. Standardized AR evaluation and prospective studies are needed to confirm its prognostic and predictive value for personalized BC treatment.
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the association between AR expression and clinical outcomes like disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in BC across different subtypes.
[METHODS] This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD4251023927) and follows PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria encompassed original studies with female patients, survival data based on AR status, and at least one additional clinicopathological marker (e.g., ER, PR, HER2, TNBC). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistics.
[RESULTS] Twenty-four studies with 17329 patients were included. In multivariate analysis, AR positivity showed a trend towards better OS (HR=0.59, 95 % CI: 0.18-1.95, p = 0.39) and DFS (HR=0.62, 95 % CI: 0.30-1.25, p = 0.18), though not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis showed significant benefits in AR and ER-positive BC for both OS (HR=0.66, 95 % CI: 0.56-0.77) and DFS (HR=0.78, 95 % CI: 0.60-1.02), while it was ambiguous in other subsets.
[CONCLUSION] AR expression is associated with improved prognosis in ER-positive BC, but its role in TNBC and HER2-positive BC remains unclear due to heterogeneity and non-significant results. Standardized AR evaluation and prospective studies are needed to confirm its prognostic and predictive value for personalized BC treatment.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Therapy-induced androgen receptor signaling as a candidate upstream driver of B7-H3-linked immune exclusion in melanoma: mechanisms and translational opportunities.
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Association between polygenic risk scores and cardiovascular events in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy in Han Chinese.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.