본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Platelet indices as prognostic biomarkers in lung cancer: A meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study.

Medicine 2026 Vol.105(6) p. e47550

Yuan M, Chen H, Liu Z, Zheng Y, Liu S, Zhang G, Yang G

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Platelet indices (PIs) - including platelet count (PC), plateletcrit (PCT), mean platelet volume, and platelet distribution width (PDW) - are routinely assessed in clinical practice.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 38,562
  • p-value P < .001
  • p-value P = .01
  • 95% CI 1.009 to 1.024
  • OR 1.33
  • HR 1.016
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Yuan M, Chen H, et al. (2026). Platelet indices as prognostic biomarkers in lung cancer: A meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study.. Medicine, 105(6), e47550. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000047550
MLA Yuan M, et al.. "Platelet indices as prognostic biomarkers in lung cancer: A meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study.." Medicine, vol. 105, no. 6, 2026, pp. e47550.
PMID 41650072

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Platelet indices (PIs) - including platelet count (PC), plateletcrit (PCT), mean platelet volume, and platelet distribution width (PDW) - are routinely assessed in clinical practice. Although observational studies have reported associations between PIs and lung cancer outcomes, the dose-response relationship and causality remain unestablished. This study aims to determine prognostic thresholds of PIs and elucidate their causal roles in lung cancer.

[METHODS] We systematically reviewed PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science (through December 2024) for studies on PIs and lung cancer prognosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled via random-effects models. Dose-response thresholds were identified using restricted cubic splines and generalized least squares. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses with inverse variance weighting assessed causality, complemented by sensitivity analyses (MR-Egger, weighted median).

[RESULTS] In the meta-analysis of 62 studies (N = 38,562 patients), elevated PC (HR = 1.016, 95% CI: 1.009 to 1.024) and PCT (HR = 1.704, 95% CI: 1.040-2.790) independently predicted poorer overall survival. A nonlinear dose-response relationship revealed that each 109/L increase in PC conferred a 4.2% higher risk of adverse prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.042, 95% CI: 1.029 to 1.056), with a critical threshold at 177.5 × 109/mL. MR analyses demonstrated population-specific causality: a 1-SD increase in PC elevated lung cancer risk by 33% in East Asians (OR = 1.33, P < .001), while in Europeans, equivalent increments in PC and PCT increased small cell lung cancer (SCLC) risk by 17% (OR = 1.17, P = .01) and 19% (OR = 1.19, P < .001), respectively. Additionally, higher PDW was causally linked to a 6% increased lung cancer risk (OR = 1.06, P = .02).

[CONCLUSION] This first study integrating dose-response meta-analysis and MR evidence identifies PC and PCT as robust prognostic biomarkers for lung cancer, with population-specific causal effects. The identified PC threshold (177.5 × 109/mL) provides a clinically actionable tool for NSCLC risk stratification, highlighting the translational potential of routine PIs monitoring in oncology practice.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Prognosis; Platelet Count; Mean Platelet Volume; Biomarkers, Tumor; Blood Platelets

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)