본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Postoperative Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.

1/5 보강
Annals of surgical oncology 📖 저널 OA 21.9% 2021: 1/6 OA 2022: 4/14 OA 2023: 6/31 OA 2024: 24/70 OA 2025: 75/257 OA 2026: 92/514 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.33(3) p. 2013-2018
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
186 patients, there were 93 in the ciNPT and 93 in the control group.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] ciNPT decreases major postoperative wound complications in patients with breast cancer undergoing oncoplastic procedures. Minimization of major postoperative complications can help ensure the timely initiation of adjuvant therapy following breast conserving oncoplastic procedures.

Harris N, Aiello P, Detz D, Hanssen D, Farrell C, Balsay-Patel C, Whiting J, Hoover S, Khakpour N, Kiluk J, Kruper L, Laronga C, Mallory M, Lee MC, Czerniecki B

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.8%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] The application of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) systems over closed surgical incisions purportedly lowers postoperative complications; however, there is little evid

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.05
  • p-value p = 0.010

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Harris N, Aiello P, et al. (2026). Postoperative Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.. Annals of surgical oncology, 33(3), 2013-2018. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18738-z
MLA Harris N, et al.. "Postoperative Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.." Annals of surgical oncology, vol. 33, no. 3, 2026, pp. 2013-2018.
PMID 41241710 ↗

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] The application of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) systems over closed surgical incisions purportedly lowers postoperative complications; however, there is little evidence to support its use in oncoplastic breast surgery. The primary objective of this study was to compare major and minor wound complication rates in patients with breast cancer undergoing oncoplastic procedures, with and without the use of the ciNPT.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing breast conserving oncoplastic procedures with placement of ciNPT system at a single institution was queried. This cohort was compared with a retrospective contemporaneous control group receiving primary two-layered suture and skin adhesive closure only. Major complications included abscess/hematoma/seroma needing drainage, and wound breakdown or asymmetry requiring return to the OR. Minor complications included breast lymphedema/erythema, minor nipple necrosis, and wound breakdown or mild asymmetry not requiring return to OR. Analyses were performed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, where applicable, and univariate logistic regression models, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

[RESULTS] Of 186 patients, there were 93 in the ciNPT and 93 in the control group. There were significantly fewer major complications in the ciNPT group (1.1% ciNPT versus 10.8% control, p = 0.010). There was no significant difference in the rates of minor complications, and no difference in complication rates based on comorbidities or tumor characteristics.

[CONCLUSIONS] ciNPT decreases major postoperative wound complications in patients with breast cancer undergoing oncoplastic procedures. Minimization of major postoperative complications can help ensure the timely initiation of adjuvant therapy following breast conserving oncoplastic procedures.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반