본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Evaluating the clinical utility of Node-RADS 1.0 for axillary lymph node assessment in breast cancer: comparison with conventional MRI diagnosis.

The British journal of radiology 2026 Vol.99(1179) p. 514-524

Liao J, Liu C, Huang X, Ye Y, Xu Z, Liang Y, Liang C, Wu L

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate the clinical utility of Node-Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) 1.0 in assessing axillary lymph node (ALN) on breast MRI.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < .01
  • Sensitivity 56%
  • Specificity 92%

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Liao J, Liu C, et al. (2026). Evaluating the clinical utility of Node-RADS 1.0 for axillary lymph node assessment in breast cancer: comparison with conventional MRI diagnosis.. The British journal of radiology, 99(1179), 514-524. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf304
MLA Liao J, et al.. "Evaluating the clinical utility of Node-RADS 1.0 for axillary lymph node assessment in breast cancer: comparison with conventional MRI diagnosis.." The British journal of radiology, vol. 99, no. 1179, 2026, pp. 514-524.
PMID 41352974
DOI 10.1093/bjr/tqaf304

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate the clinical utility of Node-Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) 1.0 in assessing axillary lymph node (ALN) on breast MRI.

[METHODS] This retrospective study included women with clinical T1-T2 stage breast cancer who underwent surgery between April 2014 and March 2023. MRI-ALN status was first evaluated using routine clinical diagnostic criteria. Node-RADS scores were subsequently assigned based on preoperative MRI after a 2-week interval. The optimal cut-off was determined using the Youden index. Diagnostic performance was compared for assessing ALN metastasis (ALNM) and pathological ALN (pALN) burden. In the secondary analysis, differences in imaging features were further evaluated in patients with Node-RADS < 3.

[RESULTS] The optimal cut-off for diagnosing ALNM was Node-RADS >1. Compared with MRI-ALN status, Node-RADS score demonstrated lower sensitivity (56% vs. 71%, P < .01), but comparable specificity (92% vs. 85%, P = .16). For assessing pALN burden, Node-RADS > 2 was the optimal cut-off with lower sensitivity (55% vs. 77%, P < .01) but higher specificity (82% vs. 62%, P < .01). In the secondary analysis, patients with ALNM showed significant differences in cortical morphology and the suspicious breast-side lymph node sign.

[CONCLUSIONS] Node-RADS 1.0 showed lower sensitivity than conventional MRI diagnosis in assessing ALNM but demonstrated good specificity in evaluating ALNM and pALN burden.

[ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE] Node-RADS 1.0 showed lower sensitivity than conventional MRI diagnosis in assessing ALNM. The potential values of cortical morphology and the suspicious breast-side lymph node sign in improving the sensitivity of Node-RADS 1.0 warrant further investigation.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Axilla; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymph Nodes; Aged; Sensitivity and Specificity; Adult

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)