본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience.

1/5 보강
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 📖 저널 OA 4.9% 2026 Vol.52(3) p. 111303
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
132269 patients, we identified 2427 patients with cT4abc BC (1.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Cox analyses showed no difference in OS or LRR between patients with cT4abc and those with T4d BCs, neither at univariable or multivariable analysis. [CONCLUSIONS] The current study confirms well-known features of cLABCs and underscores the importance of multimodal treatment, which is often underused in these patients.

van Dam P, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Marotti L, Verhaegen J, Aristei C, Cardoso MJ, Cheung KL, Curigliano G, De Vries J, Santini D, Sardanelli F, Rubio IT

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] The aim of this study was to assess clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities used and outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.054
  • p-value p < 0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA van Dam P, Tomatis M, et al. (2026). Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 52(3), 111303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.111303
MLA van Dam P, et al.. "Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience.." European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 52, no. 3, 2026, pp. 111303.
PMID 41391957

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The aim of this study was to assess clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities used and outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] we searched the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) data warehouse for clinically LABC cT4a-d - in the 2013-2022 timeframe.

[RESULTS] Of a total of 132269 patients, we identified 2427 patients with cT4abc BC (1.83 %) and 977 with inflammatory (T4d) BCs (0.74 %), of whom 542/2427 (20.1 %) and 251/977 (25.6 %), respectively, had metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.054. Ninety percent of patients with cT4abcM0 and 88.8 % of patients with cT4dM0 disease had surgery (p = 0.369) and 90.9 % and 88.7 % (p = 0.187) endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), adjuvant CT, biological drugs and radiotherapy were given in 33.2 %, 47.0 %, 67.1 % and 61.1 % of cT4abcM0 cases compared to 77.3 %, 80.4 %, 87.7 % and 80.2 % of cT4dM0 cases (all p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age <70 years, luminal A and HER-2 pure subtype, surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment (all p ≤ 0.034) were determinants of better overall survival (OS). Local recurrence rate (LRR) was significantly lower in patients receiving radiotherapy or endocrine therapy (p ≤ 0.012). Cox analyses showed no difference in OS or LRR between patients with cT4abc and those with T4d BCs, neither at univariable or multivariable analysis.

[CONCLUSIONS] The current study confirms well-known features of cLABCs and underscores the importance of multimodal treatment, which is often underused in these patients.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH