Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
132269 patients, we identified 2427 patients with cT4abc BC (1.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Cox analyses showed no difference in OS or LRR between patients with cT4abc and those with T4d BCs, neither at univariable or multivariable analysis. [CONCLUSIONS] The current study confirms well-known features of cLABCs and underscores the importance of multimodal treatment, which is often underused in these patients.
[BACKGROUND] The aim of this study was to assess clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities used and outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
- p-value p = 0.054
- p-value p < 0.001
APA
van Dam P, Tomatis M, et al. (2026). Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 52(3), 111303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.111303
MLA
van Dam P, et al.. "Locally advanced breast cancers: the EUSOMA experience.." European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 52, no. 3, 2026, pp. 111303.
PMID
41391957
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The aim of this study was to assess clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities used and outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] we searched the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) data warehouse for clinically LABC cT4a-d - in the 2013-2022 timeframe.
[RESULTS] Of a total of 132269 patients, we identified 2427 patients with cT4abc BC (1.83 %) and 977 with inflammatory (T4d) BCs (0.74 %), of whom 542/2427 (20.1 %) and 251/977 (25.6 %), respectively, had metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.054. Ninety percent of patients with cT4abcM0 and 88.8 % of patients with cT4dM0 disease had surgery (p = 0.369) and 90.9 % and 88.7 % (p = 0.187) endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), adjuvant CT, biological drugs and radiotherapy were given in 33.2 %, 47.0 %, 67.1 % and 61.1 % of cT4abcM0 cases compared to 77.3 %, 80.4 %, 87.7 % and 80.2 % of cT4dM0 cases (all p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age <70 years, luminal A and HER-2 pure subtype, surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment (all p ≤ 0.034) were determinants of better overall survival (OS). Local recurrence rate (LRR) was significantly lower in patients receiving radiotherapy or endocrine therapy (p ≤ 0.012). Cox analyses showed no difference in OS or LRR between patients with cT4abc and those with T4d BCs, neither at univariable or multivariable analysis.
[CONCLUSIONS] The current study confirms well-known features of cLABCs and underscores the importance of multimodal treatment, which is often underused in these patients.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] we searched the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) data warehouse for clinically LABC cT4a-d - in the 2013-2022 timeframe.
[RESULTS] Of a total of 132269 patients, we identified 2427 patients with cT4abc BC (1.83 %) and 977 with inflammatory (T4d) BCs (0.74 %), of whom 542/2427 (20.1 %) and 251/977 (25.6 %), respectively, had metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.054. Ninety percent of patients with cT4abcM0 and 88.8 % of patients with cT4dM0 disease had surgery (p = 0.369) and 90.9 % and 88.7 % (p = 0.187) endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), adjuvant CT, biological drugs and radiotherapy were given in 33.2 %, 47.0 %, 67.1 % and 61.1 % of cT4abcM0 cases compared to 77.3 %, 80.4 %, 87.7 % and 80.2 % of cT4dM0 cases (all p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that age <70 years, luminal A and HER-2 pure subtype, surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment (all p ≤ 0.034) were determinants of better overall survival (OS). Local recurrence rate (LRR) was significantly lower in patients receiving radiotherapy or endocrine therapy (p ≤ 0.012). Cox analyses showed no difference in OS or LRR between patients with cT4abc and those with T4d BCs, neither at univariable or multivariable analysis.
[CONCLUSIONS] The current study confirms well-known features of cLABCs and underscores the importance of multimodal treatment, which is often underused in these patients.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
- Humans
- Female
- Middle Aged
- Breast Neoplasms
- Aged
- Adult
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Neoplasm Staging
- Survival Rate
- Chemotherapy
- Adjuvant
- Mastectomy
- Radiotherapy
- 80 and over
- Retrospective Studies
- Europe
- Health care
- Inflammatory breast neoplasms
- Locally advanced breast cancer
- Neoadjuvant therapy
- Quality indicators