본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study.

1/5 보강
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 📖 저널 OA 34.4% 2022: 4/6 OA 2024: 4/10 OA 2025: 30/61 OA 2026: 37/143 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.44(7) p. 575-585
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
129 patients from 26 countries were enrolled.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
TLN marking and TAD/TLNB, we evaluated different marking methods with respect to detection and removal rates and clinical performance
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음

Banys-Paluchowski M, Hartmann S, de Boniface J, Gentilini OD, Ditsch N, Stickeler E

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Surgical axillary staging in patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC) who converted to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed significantly in rec

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Banys-Paluchowski M, Hartmann S, et al. (2026). Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 44(7), 575-585. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-01921
MLA Banys-Paluchowski M, et al.. "Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study.." Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 44, no. 7, 2026, pp. 575-585.
PMID 41564379 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Surgical axillary staging in patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC) who converted to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed significantly in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) and target lymph node (TLN) biopsy (TLNB) became increasingly popular. However, data comparing marking techniques for the TLN are limited. Here, we evaluate marking techniques in the largest prospective cohort worldwide.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Among patients from the ongoing prospective multicenter AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) study who received TLN marking and TAD/TLNB, we evaluated different marking methods with respect to detection and removal rates and clinical performance.

[RESULTS] Until January 6, 2025, 6,129 patients from 26 countries were enrolled. Of these patients, 2,596 had ≥1 TLN marked before NACT and completed surgery; 13.3% of the patients had ≥4 suspicious nodes at diagnosis. Pre-NACT TLN marking used a clip in 2,003 patients (77.2%), magnetic seed in 287 (11.1%), carbon ink in 192 (7.4%), radar marker in 119 (4.6%), radioactive seed in 18 (0.7%), radiofrequency identification device (RFID) in 12 (0.5%), or other methods in two (0.1%). One TLN was marked in 2,427 patients (93.5%), two TLNs in 138 (5.3%), and ≥3 in 27 patients (1%). Targeted removal of the TLN was planned in 2,100 patients (80.9%; TAD in 2,076 [80.0%] and TLNB in 24 [0.9%]). The TLN was detected and removed by TAD/TLNB in 1,915 patients (91.2%). TLN detection rate was the highest in patients whose TLNs were marked pre-NACT with markers suitable for probe-guided detection (96.6%; radioactive seed: 100%, magnetic seed: 96.9%, radar marker: 96.1%, RFID: 90%), followed by carbon ink (94.9%) and clip (89.6%; < .001).

[CONCLUSION] This large prospective analysis of patients with initially clinically node-positive BC receiving NACT demonstrates that probe-guided detection markers used to mark metastatic nodes before NACT provide superior detection rates.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반