Virtual patient modeling for generative-AI-assisted treatment decision-making in lymphedema care: AI tends to favor more aggressive treatment.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
100 patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema following breast cancer surgery was constructed using generative pre-trained transformer-4 omni (GPT-4o).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Our reproducible simulation framework identified this bias and variability, clarifying both strengths and limitations of gen-AI. This type of AI-on-AI observational study may help improve the accuracy of AI and support its future role in clinical care.
[BACKGROUND] The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (gen-AI) has prompted interest in whether it can recognize and respond to individual clinical backgrounds in treatment decision
APA
Tsujimoto Y, Shiraishi M, et al. (2026). Virtual patient modeling for generative-AI-assisted treatment decision-making in lymphedema care: AI tends to favor more aggressive treatment.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 52(3), 111391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111391
MLA
Tsujimoto Y, et al.. "Virtual patient modeling for generative-AI-assisted treatment decision-making in lymphedema care: AI tends to favor more aggressive treatment.." European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 52, no. 3, 2026, pp. 111391.
PMID
41564847 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (gen-AI) has prompted interest in whether it can recognize and respond to individual clinical backgrounds in treatment decision-making. To explore this, we developed a virtual patient model for lymphedema and conducted an observational study to examine what treatments AI would recommend, whether the recommendations were individualized, and what tendencies the AI exhibited.
[METHODS] A virtual cohort of 100 patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema following breast cancer surgery was constructed using generative pre-trained transformer-4 omni (GPT-4o). For each virtual patient, six clinical questions, based on the Japanese Lymphedema Guidelines 2024, were submitted to the AI to elicit individualized recommendations. The answers obtained were compared with guidelines-defined recommendation levels to assess concordance, deviation, and treatment tendencies, analyzed by patient factors.
[RESULTS] Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GPT-4o-generated recommendations were tailored to individual patient characteristics. They showed high concordance with guideline-defined recommendations for conservative care but greater variability and bias toward invasive options in surgical contexts.
[CONCLUSION] The preference of gen-AI for invasive treatments may reflect an overestimation of the benefits of performing treatments rather than withholding them, especially in invasive treatments. This bias shows a limitation of current gen-AI in complex decisions. Our reproducible simulation framework identified this bias and variability, clarifying both strengths and limitations of gen-AI. This type of AI-on-AI observational study may help improve the accuracy of AI and support its future role in clinical care.
[METHODS] A virtual cohort of 100 patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema following breast cancer surgery was constructed using generative pre-trained transformer-4 omni (GPT-4o). For each virtual patient, six clinical questions, based on the Japanese Lymphedema Guidelines 2024, were submitted to the AI to elicit individualized recommendations. The answers obtained were compared with guidelines-defined recommendation levels to assess concordance, deviation, and treatment tendencies, analyzed by patient factors.
[RESULTS] Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GPT-4o-generated recommendations were tailored to individual patient characteristics. They showed high concordance with guideline-defined recommendations for conservative care but greater variability and bias toward invasive options in surgical contexts.
[CONCLUSION] The preference of gen-AI for invasive treatments may reflect an overestimation of the benefits of performing treatments rather than withholding them, especially in invasive treatments. This bias shows a limitation of current gen-AI in complex decisions. Our reproducible simulation framework identified this bias and variability, clarifying both strengths and limitations of gen-AI. This type of AI-on-AI observational study may help improve the accuracy of AI and support its future role in clinical care.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.