본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Efficacy of a sexual quality of life intervention for couples facing metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Cancer 2026 Vol.132(5) p. e70334

Reese JB, Zimmaro LA, Sorice KA, Zhang L, Gorman JR, Daly MB, Zaleta AK, Porter LS

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often report severe, long-standing concerns with their sexual quality of life (QOL), yet interventions for this population are scarce.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 110
  • p-value p = .018
  • p-value p = .007
  • 연구 설계 randomized controlled trial

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Reese JB, Zimmaro LA, et al. (2026). Efficacy of a sexual quality of life intervention for couples facing metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial.. Cancer, 132(5), e70334. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70334
MLA Reese JB, et al.. "Efficacy of a sexual quality of life intervention for couples facing metastatic breast cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial.." Cancer, vol. 132, no. 5, 2026, pp. e70334.
PMID 41722045
DOI 10.1002/cncr.70334

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often report severe, long-standing concerns with their sexual quality of life (QOL), yet interventions for this population are scarce. This study evaluated the efficacy of a couple-based sexual QOL intervention adapted for MBC couples in a randomized controlled trial.

[METHODS] Fifty-five female MBC patients reporting sexual concerns and their intimate partners (N = 110 participants) were randomized to Adapted Intimacy Enhancement (AIE), a four-session videoconference intervention providing education and skills training for coping with sexual/intimacy concerns, or Enhanced Care-As-Usual (ECAU; informational booklet). Outcomes (measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up) included patients' sexual outcomes (sexual function/distress/self-efficacy; primary), patients' psychosocial outcomes (sexual communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress; secondary), and similar partner outcomes (secondary). Mixed linear regression models assessed intervention effects on outcomes at follow-ups; psychosocial outcomes were analyzed using dyadic analyses. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated.

[RESULTS] Compared to ECAU, patients in AIE reported greater improvements in overall sexual function (p = .018), desire (p = .007), and sexual distress (p = .046) at 6 months, and in sexual satisfaction at both post-intervention (p = .02) and 6 months (p < .001). Partners in AIE reported greater improvements in sexual distress (p = .006), sexual self-efficacy (p = .008), sexual communication (p = .004), and relationship intimacy (p = .01) at 6 months. Effects were largest for patient sexual satisfaction and partner sexual distress at 6 months.

[CONCLUSIONS] Compared to a detailed informational booklet on sex/intimacy, the couple-based AIE intervention yielded long-term benefits for MBC patients' sexual outcomes and partners' sexual distress and psychosocial outcomes. Future research should identify intervention mediators and optimal dissemination methods.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Quality of Life; Breast Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Sexual Behavior; Adult; Sexual Partners; Male; Adaptation, Psychological; Aged

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)