본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

OVH-guided planning for superior heart and lung sparing in breast cancer radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2026 Vol.27(3) p. e70513

Lei H, Li D, Wei W, Zheng H, Wu X, Xue X

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE] Manual planning in breast cancer radiotherapy is often time-consuming and operator-dependent, leading to inconsistencies in plan quality.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • p-value p < 0.05

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Lei H, Li D, et al. (2026). OVH-guided planning for superior heart and lung sparing in breast cancer radiotherapy.. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 27(3), e70513. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70513
MLA Lei H, et al.. "OVH-guided planning for superior heart and lung sparing in breast cancer radiotherapy.." Journal of applied clinical medical physics, vol. 27, no. 3, 2026, pp. e70513.
PMID 41795651
DOI 10.1002/acm2.70513

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE] Manual planning in breast cancer radiotherapy is often time-consuming and operator-dependent, leading to inconsistencies in plan quality. This study validated an automated workflow using overlap volume histograms (OVH) to predict patient-specific dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints, aiming to enhance cardiopulmonary sparing and planning efficiency.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A historical database of 322 patients was stratified into four groups: left/right post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRMRT) and left/right breast-conserving radiotherapy (BCRT). Linear regression models were established to correlate OVH-derived geometric metrics (L) with corresponding DVH-based dose constraints (D). These predictive models were integrated into the Monaco treatment planning system via a custom Python script to provide an improved automated planning workflow. The workflow's performance was prospectively validated on 80 independent testing cases (20 per group). Automated plans were generated using the predicted constraints and compared dosimetrically against clinically approved manual plans.

[RESULTS] Significant linear correlations were observed between L and D for all OARs (r = 0.51-0.72, p < 0.001). In the PMRMRT testing cohorts, the automated workflow significantly reduced doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung compared to manual planning (p < 0.05). For left-sided PMRMRT, the heart dose was reduced by 15.6% (D), 18.7% (D), and 9.8% (D), while the ipsilateral lung dose decreased by up to 6.3% (D). In BCRT cases, automated plans were not significant improved compared to manual plans. Importantly, all automated plans maintained target volume coverage and dose homogeneity comparable to manual plans (p > 0.05).

[CONCLUSION] The OVH-based framework effectively translated anatomy into achievable objectives, significantly improving heart and lung sparing for complex PMRMRT cases while streamlining clinical workflows.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Organs at Risk; Female; Radiotherapy Dosage; Heart; Breast Neoplasms; Lung; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Organ Sparing Treatments

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)