본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendations: The 2026 update.

1/5 보강
Journal of hepatology 📖 저널 OA 4.4% 2026 Vol.84(3) p. 631-654
Retraction 확인
출처

Reig M, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, Díaz A, Llarch N, Iserte G, Mollà M, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Yanagihara TK, Ayuso C, Torres F, Bruix J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

The 2026 BCLC update incorporates recent therapeutic advances in HCC into its recommendations, while preserving simplicity.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Reig M, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli M, et al. (2026). BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendations: The 2026 update.. Journal of hepatology, 84(3), 631-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2025.10.020
MLA Reig M, et al.. "BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendations: The 2026 update.." Journal of hepatology, vol. 84, no. 3, 2026, pp. 631-654.
PMID 41151697

Abstract

The 2026 BCLC update incorporates recent therapeutic advances in HCC into its recommendations, while preserving simplicity. Each disease stage remains directly linked to its evidence-based first-line treatment option. The BCLC algorithm provides guidance for evaluating patient prognosis and proposes a therapeutic strategy according to the current scientific evidence. Tumour boards require structured methodologies to address clinical complexity. Beyond published evidence, decision-making should incorporate biological, psychosocial, and contextual factors that may affect morbidity, feasibility, and patient vulnerability. Such a multidimensional approach ensures treatments remain evidence-based and patient-centred. The updated clinical decision-making chapter embeds the CUSE (Complexity, Uncertainty, Subjectivity, Emotion) framework. CUSE turns unavoidable doubt into a shared, iterative process to: (i) define the therapeutic goal (survival, tumour control, quality of life, etc.); (ii) grade each option, noting evidence strength and gaps; (iii) align choices with comorbidities, feasibility, oncologic risk, and patient values and goals; and (iv) select a plan with regular check-ins as new information or needs arise.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH