The future of gynecologic oncologic surgery: a narrative review of current surgical trials.
Recent advances in gynecologic oncology have driven a paradigm shift toward less invasive, more personalized surgical approaches.
APA
Fucina S, Reato C, et al. (2026). The future of gynecologic oncologic surgery: a narrative review of current surgical trials.. Journal of gynecologic oncology, 37(2), e37. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e37
MLA
Fucina S, et al.. "The future of gynecologic oncologic surgery: a narrative review of current surgical trials.." Journal of gynecologic oncology, vol. 37, no. 2, 2026, pp. e37.
PMID
41312629
Abstract
Recent advances in gynecologic oncology have driven a paradigm shift toward less invasive, more personalized surgical approaches. This narrative review critically examines key ongoing international trials investigating innovative surgical strategies across vulvar, cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, with a focus on improving oncologic outcomes while minimizing morbidity. In vulvar cancer, trials are exploring the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the replacement of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy with chemoradiation in selected patients. For cervical cancer, large multicenter randomized trials are evaluating the oncologic safety of minimally invasive hysterectomy, surgical staging for para-aortic disease, and robotic-assisted surgery. In the contest of ovarian cancer, randomized trials are assessing the role of lymphadenectomy in early-stage disease, the optimal timing of cytoreductive surgery (primary versus interval), and the potential benefits of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, even in cases of platinum-resistant recurrence. For endometrial cancer, both observational and interventional studies are investigating sentinel lymph nodes mapping and robotic-assisted hysterectomy as alternatives to traditional staging procedures. Collectively, these trials underscore the growing importance of individualized treatment strategies guided by disease stage, histologic subtype, response to neoadjuvant therapy, and patient-specific factors. While minimally invasive techniques and surgical de-escalation appear promising for selected patient populations, critical questions remain regarding long-term oncologic safety, cost-effectiveness, and the consistency of practice across institutions. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence and outlines how the outcomes of these pivotal studies are expected to influence future guidelines in gynecologic cancer surgery.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Lymph Node Excision; Endometrial Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures