본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Artificial intelligence-driven prostate cancer diagnosis: Enhancing accuracy and personalizing patient care.

Urologic oncology 2026 Vol.44(3) p. 110959

Zhang X, Xiao N, Liang H, Li P, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Zhou B, Yao S, Yang Z, Chen J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Prostate cancer remains a major global burden; diagnostic pathways rely on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and histopathology but face false positi

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • Sensitivity 90%

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Zhang X, Xiao N, et al. (2026). Artificial intelligence-driven prostate cancer diagnosis: Enhancing accuracy and personalizing patient care.. Urologic oncology, 44(3), 110959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.013
MLA Zhang X, et al.. "Artificial intelligence-driven prostate cancer diagnosis: Enhancing accuracy and personalizing patient care.." Urologic oncology, vol. 44, no. 3, 2026, pp. 110959.
PMID 41423376

Abstract

Prostate cancer remains a major global burden; diagnostic pathways rely on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and histopathology but face false positives, interobserver variability, and risk of overtreatment. We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed human studies (2015-February 2025; PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar) on artificial intelligence (AI) across imaging and digital pathology. Evidence shows that assistive AI can match or exceed expert performance while improving workflow. In a large international paired confirmatory study (PI-CAI), an MRI-based AI system achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.91 versus 0.86 for 62 radiologists, detected 6.8% more Grade Group (GG) ≥2 cancers at matched specificity, and yielded ∼50% fewer false positives and 20% fewer indolent (GG1) detections at matched sensitivity. Risk tools configured for high-sensitivity rule-out (90%-95%) report high negative predictive value (NPV) 97.5% to 98.0% and enable meaningful biopsy avoidance. In digital pathology, independent assessments of Paige Prostate report 97.7% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity on core biopsies, while real-world deployments reduce immunohistochemistry requests, second-opinion rates, and reporting time. Collectively, these data support deploying AI as a second-reader/triage with standardized acquisition and quality assurance, local calibration, and drift monitoring. Priority evidence needs include multicenter prospective studies and pragmatic real-world evidence (RWE) reporting patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness, with continued attention to fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Male; Artificial Intelligence; Precision Medicine; Patient Care

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)