Women's screening preferences shift after being informed about the 2024 USPSTF breast cancer screening guideline.
가이드라인
1/5 보강
[INTRODUCTION] In 2024 the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised its breast cancer screening (BCS) guidelines to recommend that all women screen biennially from age 40-74, repl
- p-value p < 0.001
APA
Parmet T, Yoder G, et al. (2026). Women's screening preferences shift after being informed about the 2024 USPSTF breast cancer screening guideline.. Patient education and counseling, 148, 109581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2026.109581
MLA
Parmet T, et al.. "Women's screening preferences shift after being informed about the 2024 USPSTF breast cancer screening guideline.." Patient education and counseling, vol. 148, 2026, pp. 109581.
PMID
41819785 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] In 2024 the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised its breast cancer screening (BCS) guidelines to recommend that all women screen biennially from age 40-74, replacing its prior recommendation that women ages 40-49 engage in informed decision-making about when to begin BCS. We examined how communicating information about the new guideline influenced women's screening preferences and views on what information women should receive before screening.
[METHODS] This study included 301 women who were previously enrolled in a longitudinal study where they were exposed to a decision aid informing them about BCS harms and benefits and the prior USPSTF recommendation. Participants completed an online survey including an informational intervention that presented information about the 2024 USPSTF recommendation. Outcomes included screening preferences pre- and post-intervention and ratings (1 =not at all important to 4 =very important) of information considered important to know before screening.
[RESULTS] Information about the new guideline influenced participants' screening preferences. Post-intervention, compared with pre-intervention, participants preferred to screen at their current age (86% vs 81%; p < 0.001) and biennially thereafter (45% vs 33%; p < 0.001). Participants believed it was important for women to be informed about the benefits of screening (M=3.77), their personal risk of breast cancer (M=3.75), and about overdiagnosis (M=3.48) and false positives (M=3.61).
[CONCLUSIONS] Being informed about the 2024 USPSTF mammography guidelines shifted screening preferences to be consistent with the new guideline. Even though the new guideline deemphasizes informed decision-making, women still wanted to be informed about BCS harms and benefits, as well as their personal cancer risk.
[PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS] Clinicians and health systems may consider pairing clear and directive information about the new BCS guidelines with brief information about BCS benefits and harms and personal risk, to support guideline-concordant and informed screening decisions.
[METHODS] This study included 301 women who were previously enrolled in a longitudinal study where they were exposed to a decision aid informing them about BCS harms and benefits and the prior USPSTF recommendation. Participants completed an online survey including an informational intervention that presented information about the 2024 USPSTF recommendation. Outcomes included screening preferences pre- and post-intervention and ratings (1 =not at all important to 4 =very important) of information considered important to know before screening.
[RESULTS] Information about the new guideline influenced participants' screening preferences. Post-intervention, compared with pre-intervention, participants preferred to screen at their current age (86% vs 81%; p < 0.001) and biennially thereafter (45% vs 33%; p < 0.001). Participants believed it was important for women to be informed about the benefits of screening (M=3.77), their personal risk of breast cancer (M=3.75), and about overdiagnosis (M=3.48) and false positives (M=3.61).
[CONCLUSIONS] Being informed about the 2024 USPSTF mammography guidelines shifted screening preferences to be consistent with the new guideline. Even though the new guideline deemphasizes informed decision-making, women still wanted to be informed about BCS harms and benefits, as well as their personal cancer risk.
[PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS] Clinicians and health systems may consider pairing clear and directive information about the new BCS guidelines with brief information about BCS benefits and harms and personal risk, to support guideline-concordant and informed screening decisions.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Artificial intelligence and breast cancer screening in Serbia: a dual-perspective qualitative study among radiologists and screening-aged women.
- Does Messaging for Reducing Breast Cancer Overscreening in Older Women Have Differential Responses among Medical Minimizers and Maximizers?
- Ensemble Deep Learning-Based High-Precision Framework for Breast Cancer Detection from Histopathological Images.
- Comparing Sexual and Gender Minority and Cisgender Heterosexual Missourians' Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Prevalence: The 2022 Missouri County-Level Study.
- Time-Varying Hormonal Treatment and Metastasis-Free Survival Among ER+ Breast Cancer Patients: A Natural History Modelling Approach.
- Evaluation of culturally tailored breast cancer education video in a primarily Hispanic population.