본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

What Will Patients Find When They Search Online for AI and Mammography? An Examination of Readability and Understandability Metrics in Online Patient Education Materials.

1/5 보강
Clinical breast cancer 2026 Vol.26(5) p. 36-45
Retraction 확인
출처

Araen T, Arruda R, Bernstein MH, Baird GL

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being integrated into breast cancer screening, improving cancer detection and workflow efficiency.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 56

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Araen T, Arruda R, et al. (2026). What Will Patients Find When They Search Online for AI and Mammography? An Examination of Readability and Understandability Metrics in Online Patient Education Materials.. Clinical breast cancer, 26(5), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2026.03.007
MLA Araen T, et al.. "What Will Patients Find When They Search Online for AI and Mammography? An Examination of Readability and Understandability Metrics in Online Patient Education Materials.." Clinical breast cancer, vol. 26, no. 5, 2026, pp. 36-45.
PMID 41932200

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being integrated into breast cancer screening, improving cancer detection and workflow efficiency. As patients become increasingly exposed to information about AI in mammography through news outlets, hospitals, and commercial entities, they are likely to seek information online. However, the readability and understandability of Online patient education materials (OPEM) for AI in mammography have not been examined.

[METHODS] We collected the top 20 nonsponsored results for each of 5 AI-related internet search terms in mammography. After removing duplicates, each webpage (n = 56) was categorized by the source type and evaluated for readability using 6 readability algorithms, as well as for understandability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials.

[RESULTS] The average grade-level readability across all webpages was 14.2, exceeding both the American Medical Association (sixth grade) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (eighth grade) recommendations. Reading ease scores placed most content in the "difficult" range, which is most suitable for college-level readers. Understandability averaged 72.4%, with variation by source type: commercial, government, and patient advocacy pages scored highest, while academic and medical media sources scored lowest.

[CONCLUSION] Online information about AI in mammography is generally written at a level too advanced for most patients and meets only the minimum standards of understandability. Because patients are likely to encounter both OPEM and non-OPEM sources when searching online, clinicians should be prepared to guide them toward accessible, reliable resources. Developing standardized, patient-focused education materials by professional medical societies could ensure access to comprehensible information.