Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma: A Systematic Review.
메타분석
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
13 patients included across 5 studies.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] These results suggest that EEA offers a safe and effective minimally invasive approach in preserving threatened vision for selected primary ONSM cases. Further research is required to determine optimal timing, long-term efficacy, and integration with radiotherapy.
[BACKGROUND] Primary optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) is a rare but clinically significant benign tumor that can cause irreversible loss of vision.
- 연구 설계 systematic review
APA
Sivanathan S, Al-Rabadi J, et al. (2026). Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma: A Systematic Review.. World neurosurgery, 207, 124817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2026.124817
MLA
Sivanathan S, et al.. "Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma: A Systematic Review.." World neurosurgery, vol. 207, 2026, pp. 124817.
PMID
41570978 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Primary optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) is a rare but clinically significant benign tumor that can cause irreversible loss of vision. Active management strategies in primary ONSM are controversial, and current treatment favors radiotherapy, despite its associated risks. Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) surgery offers a minimally invasive alternative to decompress the optic nerve and restore visual function. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of EEA for decompression of the optic nerve, focusing on visual outcomes and complications.
[METHODS] A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies reporting operative management using EEA in patients above 16 years with radiographically confirmed primary ONSM that demonstrate optic canal confinement, excluding studies evaluating secondary ONSM or tumors with any evidence of intracranial extension. Post-operative outcome data were collected including visual acuity (VA), visual fields and complications.
[RESULTS] A total of 1065 articles were screened, with 13 patients included across 5 studies. VA improved post-operatively in 5 out of 13 patients (≥ 0.2 decrease in VA LogMAR score) and VA scores were stable in 7 out of 13 patients, post-operatively (where change in LogMAR score <0.2). One patient had worsened vision at 2-year follow-up (>0.2 increase in VA LogMAR score). Of note, this patient had established criteria for "poor vision" pre-operatively, as defined by World Health Organization (WHO) (≥ 0.5 LogMAR) and although vision was stable during the first 6 months of follow-up, VA deteriorated to WHO criteria for blindness (LogMAR > 1.3) with scores of 1.38 and 1.78 LogMAR at 12 and 24 months, respectively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported in the included studies.
[CONCLUSIONS] These results suggest that EEA offers a safe and effective minimally invasive approach in preserving threatened vision for selected primary ONSM cases. Further research is required to determine optimal timing, long-term efficacy, and integration with radiotherapy.
[METHODS] A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies reporting operative management using EEA in patients above 16 years with radiographically confirmed primary ONSM that demonstrate optic canal confinement, excluding studies evaluating secondary ONSM or tumors with any evidence of intracranial extension. Post-operative outcome data were collected including visual acuity (VA), visual fields and complications.
[RESULTS] A total of 1065 articles were screened, with 13 patients included across 5 studies. VA improved post-operatively in 5 out of 13 patients (≥ 0.2 decrease in VA LogMAR score) and VA scores were stable in 7 out of 13 patients, post-operatively (where change in LogMAR score <0.2). One patient had worsened vision at 2-year follow-up (>0.2 increase in VA LogMAR score). Of note, this patient had established criteria for "poor vision" pre-operatively, as defined by World Health Organization (WHO) (≥ 0.5 LogMAR) and although vision was stable during the first 6 months of follow-up, VA deteriorated to WHO criteria for blindness (LogMAR > 1.3) with scores of 1.38 and 1.78 LogMAR at 12 and 24 months, respectively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported in the included studies.
[CONCLUSIONS] These results suggest that EEA offers a safe and effective minimally invasive approach in preserving threatened vision for selected primary ONSM cases. Further research is required to determine optimal timing, long-term efficacy, and integration with radiotherapy.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.