본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among F-FDG Dual-Gated PET/CT, Single-Gated PET/MRI, and Cardiac MRI.

1/5 보강
Journal of nuclear medicine technology 📖 저널 OA 10% 2022: 0/2 OA 2023: 0/1 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 1/9 OA 2026: 1/7 OA 2022~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
PET-based methods produced comparable LVEF measurements to those obtained by cardiac MRI.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
PET-based methods produced comparable LVEF measurements to those obtained by cardiac MRI. The use of PET-based methods to evaluate LVEF may offer advantages in terms of convenience and accessibility in this population.

Toompong P, Jantarato A, Siripongsatian D, Panperee P, Promteangtrong C, Kunawudhi A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a critical parameter in the evaluation of cardiac function, and its measurement can guide treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer undergoing che

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Toompong P, Jantarato A, et al. (2026). Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among F-FDG Dual-Gated PET/CT, Single-Gated PET/MRI, and Cardiac MRI.. Journal of nuclear medicine technology. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.271050
MLA Toompong P, et al.. "Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among F-FDG Dual-Gated PET/CT, Single-Gated PET/MRI, and Cardiac MRI.." Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 2026.
PMID 41844332 ↗

Abstract

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a critical parameter in the evaluation of cardiac function, and its measurement can guide treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. We obtained LVEF measurements with gated PET-based methods to determine if they produced comparable results to those obtained with cardiac MRI. Patients with breast cancer who visited the National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, in Bangkok, Thailand, between July 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023, for LVEF assessment were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent PET/CT using 3 different reconstruction techniques: dual-gated with electrocardiography and respiratory gating, dual-gated with artificial intelligence-assisted list-mode respiratory-compensated PET/CT (dual-gated list-mode PET/CT), and single-gated (electrocardiography-gated) PET/CT. Additionally, single-gated PET/MRI and cardiac MRI were performed to collect data on end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and LVEF. There were no statistically significant differences in LVEF measurements between any modality. Dual-gated PET/CT showed the lowest average percentage difference when compared with cardiac MRI (6.45%). Differences in EDV and ESV were not statistically significant among the PET-based methods but were significant between the cardiac MRI and all PET-based methods, with consistent percentage differences ranging from -37.64% to -39.38% for EDV and -43.68% to -45.32% for ESV. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed moderate to good reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients indicated good to strong correlations between cardiac MRI and PET/MRI and among PET-based methods. PET-based methods produced comparable LVEF measurements to those obtained by cardiac MRI. The use of PET-based methods to evaluate LVEF may offer advantages in terms of convenience and accessibility in this population.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반