본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Port Site Excision During Completion Extended Cholecystectomy for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer - A Scoping Review.

리뷰 1/5 보강
Journal of gastrointestinal cancer 📖 저널 OA 26% 2024: 1/16 OA 2025: 25/91 OA 2026: 21/74 OA 2024~2026 2026 Vol.57(1)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
170 patients who received PSE, 14 (8.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
PSE and those who did not
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
30-45 months), this difference was not statistically significant. [CONCLUSION] Routine PSE during CEC for iGBC may not be necessary, as it does not significantly reduce distant recurrence or improve overall survival.

Varshney VK, Singh S, Pandya S, Shelat VG, Chaudhari V, Sikora SS

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Completion extended cholecystectomy (CEC) is the standard treatment for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) to reduce early recurrence and improve survival.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Varshney VK, Singh S, et al. (2026). Port Site Excision During Completion Extended Cholecystectomy for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer - A Scoping Review.. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-026-01416-y
MLA Varshney VK, et al.. "Port Site Excision During Completion Extended Cholecystectomy for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer - A Scoping Review.." Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, vol. 57, no. 1, 2026.
PMID 41779281 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Completion extended cholecystectomy (CEC) is the standard treatment for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) to reduce early recurrence and improve survival. However, the necessity of laparoscopic port site excision (PSE) during CEC remains controversial. This scoping review evaluates whether routine PSE is warranted in the management of iGBC.

[METHODS] A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library using keywords such as "incidental gallbladder carcinoma," "radical cholecystectomy," "extended cholecystectomy," "port site excision," "port site recurrence," and "port site metastasis."

[RESULTS] Three original studies involving 503 iGBC patients were analyzed, comparing outcomes between those who underwent PSE and those who did not. Of the 170 patients who received PSE, 14 (8.2%) had malignant port site involvement. Recurrence rates were comparable between the PSE and non-PSE groups (36% vs. 40%). Although the median overall survival was numerically higher in the PSE group (36-89 months vs. 30-45 months), this difference was not statistically significant.

[CONCLUSION] Routine PSE during CEC for iGBC may not be necessary, as it does not significantly reduce distant recurrence or improve overall survival.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반