본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Classification and Reporting of Breast Arterial Calcifications: Current State and Ongoing Challenges.

2/5 보강
Journal of breast imaging 📖 저널 OA 6.3% 2021: 0/4 OA 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 0/2 OA 2025: 0/6 OA 2026: 3/31 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.8(2) p. 125-135 Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
TL;DR Despite the potential benefits of BAC reporting for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment, challenges remain, including the need to assess the cost-effectiveness of long-term outcomes, standardized guidelines, and effective follow-up.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-05-02
OpenAlex 토픽 · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms

Stephens K, McLin RK, Ismail RT, Ogg M, Nemer O, Plecha DM

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Despite the potential benefits of BAC reporting for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment, challenges remain, including the need to assess the cost-effectiveness of long-term outcomes, standardi

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Katherine Stephens, Ronaé K McLin, et al. (2026). Classification and Reporting of Breast Arterial Calcifications: Current State and Ongoing Challenges.. Journal of breast imaging, 8(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf074
MLA Katherine Stephens, et al.. "Classification and Reporting of Breast Arterial Calcifications: Current State and Ongoing Challenges.." Journal of breast imaging, vol. 8, no. 2, 2026, pp. 125-135.
PMID 41795886 ↗
DOI 10.1093/jbi/wbaf074

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women globally, with significant mortality and poorer outcomes compared with men. Traditional CVD risk assessment methods are less effective for women in part due to a lack of consideration for female-specific risk factors and the underrepresentation of women in research. Mammography, primarily used for breast cancer screening, also provides valuable data on breast arterial calcifications (BAC), which are associated with increased CVD risk. Despite its potential, BAC is not routinely reported or used in clinical practice due to variability in reporting practices and the absence of standardized reporting and clinical follow-up guidelines. Various qualitative and quantitative techniques for the classification of BAC and the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in automating BAC quantification have been suggested. Surveys reveal varying attitudes toward BAC reporting among patients, radiologists, and referring clinicians. Despite the potential benefits of BAC reporting for personalized cardiovascular risk assessment, challenges remain, including the need to assess the cost-effectiveness of long-term outcomes, standardized guidelines, and effective follow-up.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반