본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparing Immediate Breast Reconstruction Rates in Rural and Urban Populations: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Comparer les taux de reconstruction mammaire immédiate dans les populations rurales et urbaines : une analyse systématique et méta-analyse globales.

Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) 2026 p. 22925503261436341

Mah AE, Ranjbar D, Chai B, Snell LM

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) contributes to comprehensive breast cancer care.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Mah AE, Ranjbar D, et al. (2026). Comparing Immediate Breast Reconstruction Rates in Rural and Urban Populations: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Comparer les taux de reconstruction mammaire immédiate dans les populations rurales et urbaines : une analyse systématique et méta-analyse globales.. Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 22925503261436341. https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503261436341
MLA Mah AE, et al.. "Comparing Immediate Breast Reconstruction Rates in Rural and Urban Populations: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Comparer les taux de reconstruction mammaire immédiate dans les populations rurales et urbaines : une analyse systématique et méta-analyse globales.." Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2026, pp. 22925503261436341.
PMID 41924348

Abstract

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) contributes to comprehensive breast cancer care. Rural patients often face barriers to healthcare access and worse health outcomes versus urban counterparts. We sought to (1) compare rates of IBR among rural and urban residents; (2) identify sociodemographic and economic factors associated with breast reconstruction rates. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 15, 2025, for studies comparing IBR rates among rural versus urban individuals globally. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Exposures tool. The primary outcome was the literature-pooled odds ratio (OR) of rural patients receiving IBR versus urban patients, evaluated with a random-effects meta-analysis, followed by sensitivity and leave-one-out analyses. Univariate meta-regression was conducted to explore whether mean age, socioeconomic status (SES), and data collection year explain heterogeneity and rural-urban IBR disparities. Fifteen studies were included, encompassing 46 986 rural and 1 833 906 urban mastectomy patients. Rural patients were significantly less likely to undergo IBR (OR 0.67; 95% confidence interval [0.57-0.79],  = 97%). There was no temporal trend suggesting changes in geographic disparities in IBR rates. Mean age, SES, and midpoint data collection year did not significantly explain heterogeneity nor rural-urban IBR disparities. Rural patients were approximately 33% less likely to receive IBR versus urban patients. However, considerable heterogeneity suggested the need for research on moderators to explain this association and inform strategies to promote equitable IBR access, including ride-share programs and increased plastic surgeon density in rural communities.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)