Fourier Analysis of Bilateral Breast Asymmetry for Short-term Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
환자-대조
2/5 보강
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI in cancer detection
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
A substantial body of evidence demonstrates that measures from mammograms are predictive of breast cancer risk.
- OR 1.90
- 연구 설계 case-control
APA
John Heine, Erin Fowler, et al. (2026). Fourier Analysis of Bilateral Breast Asymmetry for Short-term Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.27.26349508
MLA
John Heine, et al.. "Fourier Analysis of Bilateral Breast Asymmetry for Short-term Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.." medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026.
PMID
41959806 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
A substantial body of evidence demonstrates that measures from mammograms are predictive of breast cancer risk. In this matched case-control study, mammograms acquired near the time of diagnosis were analyzed to investigate bilateral breast asymmetry as measure of short-term risk prediction. Specifically, contralateral breast images were compared with measures derived in the Fourier domain (FD); this technique summarizes power in concentric radial bands that cover the Fourier plane. Equivalently, this approach can be described as a multiscale characterization of the image. The summarized power difference between respective contralateral bands produces an asymmetry measure. Full field digital mammography (FFDM) and synthetic two-dimensional images from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) were investigated for women that had both types of mammograms acquired at the same time. Odds ratios (ORs) and the area under the receiver operating curves (Azs) were generated from conditional logistic regression modeling with 95% confidence intervals. Raw unprocessed FFDM images produced significant findings: OR = 1.90 (1.58, 2.29) and Az = 1.72 (0.67, 0.76) per one standard deviation unit. Associations were significant but attenuated for both clinical FFDM and DBT images: OR = 1.31 (1.11, 1.54) and Az = 0.63 (0.58, 0.67); and OR = 1.48 (1.25, 1.76) and Az = 0.65 (0.60, 0.70), respectively. Results suggest that clinical FFDM and DBT images are inferior to raw FFDM images in capturing breast asymmetry with information loss for breast cancer risk prediction. Moreover, these DBT images have lower spatial resolution but produced stronger associations than the clinical FFDM images.
📖 전문 본문 읽기 PMC JATS · ~0 KB · 영문
Full Text Availability
Full Text Availability
The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.
The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.
출처: PubMed Central (JATS). 라이선스는 원 publisher 정책을 따릅니다 — 인용 시 원문을 표기해 주세요.