본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Beneficial subgroups for PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine 2026 Vol.105(12) p. e47981

Gao R, Wang D, Su L, Zhang X, Dai T

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Esophageal cancer exhibits peak incidence in Asia and Africa, representing the sixth most common malignancy and seventh leading cause of global cancer mortality.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < .00001
  • p-value P < .00001
  • 95% CI 1.80-2.29
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Gao R, Wang D, et al. (2026). Beneficial subgroups for PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Medicine, 105(12), e47981. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000047981
MLA Gao R, et al.. "Beneficial subgroups for PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.." Medicine, vol. 105, no. 12, 2026, pp. e47981.
PMID 41861173

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Esophageal cancer exhibits peak incidence in Asia and Africa, representing the sixth most common malignancy and seventh leading cause of global cancer mortality. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) constitutes 90% of esophageal cancer cases. The European Medicines Agency approved programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for high PD-1-expressing ESCC.

[METHODS] We systematically searched randomized controlled trials of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The following outcomes were combined: overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Bias risk was rigorously evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RevMan 5.3 and R Studio (Boston) were utilized for data synthesis in this meta-analysis, with sensitivity analyses comparing fixed- and random-effects models to reinforce findings.

[RESULTS] A total of 4702 patients (PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy: 2529; chemotherapy: 2173) were enrolled in 8 randomized controlled trials. Compared with conventional chemotherapy, first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy significantly improved the overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.74; P < .00001) and objective response rate (relative risk [RR] = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.80-2.29; P < .00001) of advanced ESCC patients. Moreover, PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy provided benefits in progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.58-0.66; P < .00001). But PD-1 inhibitors were not associated with statistically lower incidences of TRAEs and grade 3 to 5 TRAEs. In subgroup analyses, except the limited benefit observed in the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score < 1 subgroup, none of the following factors significantly influenced the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor therapy: advanced age, metastatic status, number of metastatic organs, or presence of liver metastases.

[CONCLUSION] The combination of PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy demonstrates superior efficacy as first-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Both elderly patients and those with metastatic involvement derive universal benefit without increased adverse risks. However, patients with PD-L1 combined positive score < 1 may experience restricted clinical benefits. Thus, more precise predictive markers are required to stratify potential responders, enabling broader patient populations to derive benefits from PD-1 inhibitor-chemotherapy regimens.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Esophageal Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Progression-Free Survival

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)