본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Sex Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival According to Clinical Treatment Score Post-5 Years (CTS5) Risk Stratification.

Cancer research and treatment 2026 Vol.58(2) p. 525-533

Liu K, Lu ZZ, He ZY, Wu SG

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] The role of the Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) in male breast cancer (MBC) remains unclear.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Liu K, Lu ZZ, et al. (2026). Sex Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival According to Clinical Treatment Score Post-5 Years (CTS5) Risk Stratification.. Cancer research and treatment, 58(2), 525-533. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.361
MLA Liu K, et al.. "Sex Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival According to Clinical Treatment Score Post-5 Years (CTS5) Risk Stratification.." Cancer research and treatment, vol. 58, no. 2, 2026, pp. 525-533.
PMID 40441757

Abstract

[PURPOSE] The role of the Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) in male breast cancer (MBC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of CTS5 between MBC and female breast cancer (FBC).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative/estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were used for statistical analysis.

[RESULTS] This study included 169,869 patients, comprising 168,422 (99.1%) FBC and 1,447 (0.9%) MBC patients. More MBC patients had intermediate risk (IR)/high risk (HR) disease compared to FBC patients (17.7% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001). MBC patients had an inferior overall survival (OS) but similar breast cancer-specific survival compared to those with FBC. Sensitivity analyses showed that sex was an independent prognostic factor associated with OS but not breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in both the low-risk (LR) and IR/HR cohorts. Those with MBC exhibited significantly worse OS (p < 0.001) than FBC patients in both cohorts. In MBC patients, those with IR/HR disease had significantly worse OS (p < 0.001) and BCSS (p < 0.001) compared to those with LR disease. For FBC patients, the IR/HR group had also significantly worse OS (p < 0.001) and BCSS (p < 0.001) compared to the LR group.

[CONCLUSION] Our findings highlight critical differences in clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes between MBC and FBC, suggesting the need for sex-tailored approaches in breast cancer management.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Prognosis; SEER Program; Breast Neoplasms, Male; Aged; Risk Assessment; Adult; Sex Factors; Kaplan-Meier Estimate

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)