External Validation of a Pragmatic Scoring System for Predicting Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at the Time of Surgery.
2/5 보강
TL;DR
The risk model evaluated generally predicts the risk of upgrade of ADH at excisional biopsy but may underestimate the upgrade rate in the lowest-risk cohort but may underestimate the upgrade rate in the lowest-risk cohort.
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
183 cases included, the mean age was 58 years ± standard deviation 11, and 91 patients (50%) reported a family history of breast cancer.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
diagnostic mammography and surgical excision for pathologic correlation were included
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] The risk model evaluated generally predicts the risk of upgrade of ADH at excisional biopsy but may underestimate the upgrade rate in the lowest-risk cohort. Because of the small sample size, further work is needed to determine whether the rate of upgrade is truly low enough in this lowest-risk cohort to recommend against excisional biopsy.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
The risk model evaluated generally predicts the risk of upgrade of ADH at excisional biopsy but may underestimate the upgrade rate in the lowest-risk cohort but may underestimate the upgrade rate in t
APA
Walter R F Donica, Dimond Shartzer, et al. (2026). External Validation of a Pragmatic Scoring System for Predicting Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at the Time of Surgery.. Annals of surgical oncology, 33(4), 3283-3292. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18803-7
MLA
Walter R F Donica, et al.. "External Validation of a Pragmatic Scoring System for Predicting Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at the Time of Surgery.." Annals of surgical oncology, vol. 33, no. 4, 2026, pp. 3283-3292.
PMID
41432796 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) carries a variable risk of upgrade at the time of surgery to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive malignancy. We sought to externally validate a pragmatic upgrade risk scoring system previously demonstrated to have an upgrade rate of 0-2% in patients with a risk score of 0 out of 5.
[METHODS] A multicenter, retrospective review of all percutaneous biopsies containing ADH was performed from 2017 to 2023. Women aged ≥ 18 years who underwent diagnostic mammography and surgical excision for pathologic correlation were included.
[RESULTS] Among the 183 cases included, the mean age was 58 years ± standard deviation 11, and 91 patients (50%) reported a family history of breast cancer. Most biopsies were stereotactic (75%), vacuum-assisted (84%), and used 9-gauge needles (73%). Three of 14 (21%) patients with a risk score of 0 were upgraded to DCIS following surgical excision. Seven (19%) patients had a risk score of 1 upgraded - six to DCIS and one to an estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma measuring 5.45 mm in largest diameter. On multivariate analysis, age, mammographic lesion size, and suspicion of DCIS on biopsy were predictive of upgrade.
[CONCLUSIONS] The risk model evaluated generally predicts the risk of upgrade of ADH at excisional biopsy but may underestimate the upgrade rate in the lowest-risk cohort. Because of the small sample size, further work is needed to determine whether the rate of upgrade is truly low enough in this lowest-risk cohort to recommend against excisional biopsy.
[METHODS] A multicenter, retrospective review of all percutaneous biopsies containing ADH was performed from 2017 to 2023. Women aged ≥ 18 years who underwent diagnostic mammography and surgical excision for pathologic correlation were included.
[RESULTS] Among the 183 cases included, the mean age was 58 years ± standard deviation 11, and 91 patients (50%) reported a family history of breast cancer. Most biopsies were stereotactic (75%), vacuum-assisted (84%), and used 9-gauge needles (73%). Three of 14 (21%) patients with a risk score of 0 were upgraded to DCIS following surgical excision. Seven (19%) patients had a risk score of 1 upgraded - six to DCIS and one to an estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma measuring 5.45 mm in largest diameter. On multivariate analysis, age, mammographic lesion size, and suspicion of DCIS on biopsy were predictive of upgrade.
[CONCLUSIONS] The risk model evaluated generally predicts the risk of upgrade of ADH at excisional biopsy but may underestimate the upgrade rate in the lowest-risk cohort. Because of the small sample size, further work is needed to determine whether the rate of upgrade is truly low enough in this lowest-risk cohort to recommend against excisional biopsy.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.