Why are there differences in the perceived safety of office-based surgery?
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Office-based surgery has become an important method of health-care delivery, but there is controversy about its safety and which practitioners should perform it. Several states have already or are preparing to enact legislation regulating office-based surgery.
[OBJECTIVE] The objective was to discuss recent literature pertaining to the safety of office surgery and to discuss reasons why there are perceived differences in its safety.
[METHODS] The pertinent literature is reviewed. Results. The majority of studies suggest that office surgery is safe. A recent study that found to the contrary may have methodologic flaws.
[CONCLUSION] The medical and legislative community should seek to scientifically examine office surgery. Overregulation or loss of office surgery would have a tremendous impact on the management of skin cancers and the delivery of quality cosmetic and laser surgery.
[OBJECTIVE] The objective was to discuss recent literature pertaining to the safety of office surgery and to discuss reasons why there are perceived differences in its safety.
[METHODS] The pertinent literature is reviewed. Results. The majority of studies suggest that office surgery is safe. A recent study that found to the contrary may have methodologic flaws.
[CONCLUSION] The medical and legislative community should seek to scientifically examine office surgery. Overregulation or loss of office surgery would have a tremendous impact on the management of skin cancers and the delivery of quality cosmetic and laser surgery.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | skin cancers
|
C0007114
Malignant neoplasm of skin
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Humans; Safety; Surgery, Plastic