본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Erectile dysfunction following prostate biopsy: a comparative analysis of transrectal versus transperineal approaches.

메타분석 3/5 보강
International urology and nephrology 📖 저널 OA 16.5% 2022: 0/2 OA 2023: 0/1 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 4/33 OA 2026: 11/49 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.58(4) p. 1183-1193 cited 1 Sexual function and dysfunction stud
TL;DR Both TR and TP prostate biopsies are associated with a transient decline in erectile function, and the initial functional impact may be slightly greater with the TP technique, but this difference attenuates over time.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-05-01
OpenAlex 토픽 · Sexual function and dysfunction studies Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Ermis O, Sonmez MG, Tozsin A, Iyisoy MS, Yilmaz M, Sonmez G

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Both TR and TP prostate biopsies are associated with a transient decline in erectile function, and the initial functional impact may be slightly greater with the TP technique, but this difference atte

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.038
  • p-value p = 0.074
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA O. Ermis, Mehmet Giray Sönmez, et al. (2026). Erectile dysfunction following prostate biopsy: a comparative analysis of transrectal versus transperineal approaches.. International urology and nephrology, 58(4), 1183-1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04816-4
MLA O. Ermis, et al.. "Erectile dysfunction following prostate biopsy: a comparative analysis of transrectal versus transperineal approaches.." International urology and nephrology, vol. 58, no. 4, 2026, pp. 1183-1193.
PMID 41051480 ↗

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES] Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a concern for men undergoing prostate biopsy. With the increasing adoption of transperineal (TP) biopsy over transrectal (TR) biopsy, it remains unclear which approach carries a lower risk of erectile dysfunction. This study aims to be the first meta-analysis to evaluate erectile dysfunction following TR versus TP prostate biopsy at 1, 3 and 6 months intervals, thereby providing clinicians with evidence-based guidance for patient counseling and shared decision-making.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024541557) and followed PRISMA guidelines, with searches conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases up to July 2024. A total of 22 studies reporting erectile function outcomes (IIEF scores) at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months post-biopsy were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. TR and TP biopsy methods were compared using a random-effects model to assess standardized mean differences (SMD) in erectile function at each follow-up point. The risk of bias for each study was evaluated to ensure result reliability.

[RESULTS] At 1 month follow-up, a significant decline in erectile function was observed overall (SMD: - 0.3785, p = 0.038). The TP approach showed a slightly more significant decline than the TR approach; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). At 3 months follow-up, no significant differences were observed between methods overall (SMD: - 0.1663, p = 0.132), although TP biopsy alone showed a modest yet considerable decline (SMD: - 0.1868, p = 0.03). At 6 months, erectile function had generally returned to baseline, with no significant differences observed between biopsy techniques (p = 0.41).

[CONCLUSION] Both TR and TP prostate biopsies are associated with a transient decline in erectile function. These effects typically resolve by 6 months in most patients, with no significant long-term impact observed. While the initial functional impact may be slightly greater with the TP technique, this difference attenuates over time. These findings are crucial for managing patient expectations post-biopsy.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반