본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Technical systematic review supporting the 2025 AASLD Practice Guideline on management of chronic hepatitis B.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 2026 Vol.83(4) p. 998-1019

Pan CQ, Saadi S, Ghany MG, Feld JJ, Lim JK, Kim AY, Tang AS, Nguyen MH, Sulkowski MS, Terrault NA, Lok AS, Hegazi M, Hasan B, Fleti F, Nayfeh T, Abusalih MF, Seisa MO, Kabbara Allababidi A, Abbas AS, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Mohammad KS

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND AIMS] With rapid changes in the management landscape of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), this technical systematic review addresses 4 critical Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 1.58-101.51
  • OR 12.65
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Pan CQ, Saadi S, et al. (2026). Technical systematic review supporting the 2025 AASLD Practice Guideline on management of chronic hepatitis B.. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 83(4), 998-1019. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000001584
MLA Pan CQ, et al.. "Technical systematic review supporting the 2025 AASLD Practice Guideline on management of chronic hepatitis B.." Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), vol. 83, no. 4, 2026, pp. 998-1019.
PMID 41186417

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND AIMS] With rapid changes in the management landscape of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), this technical systematic review addresses 4 critical Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions to provide guidance to the formulation of recommendations to the 2025 AASLD practice guideline for management of CHB.

[APPROACH] The review was reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes were evaluated across 4 key PICOs: (1) antiviral therapy for prevention of horizontal HBV transmission in high-risk groups, (2) antiviral therapy versus observation for persons in the immune-tolerant phase, (3) discontinuation versus continuation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative individuals with undetectable HBV DNA, and (4) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in non-cirrhotic individuals with HBsAg clearance or co-infections with HCV, HDV, or HIV.

[RESULTS] For PICO 1, limited evidence suggests antiviral therapy may reduce horizontal transmission risk, though with low certainty. PICO 2 analyses reveal uncertain benefits of treating persons in the immune-tolerant phase, with very low certainty due to heterogeneity and bias. PICO 3 analyses demonstrate that discontinuing antiviral therapy in persons who are HBeAg negative with undetectable HBV DNA increases HBsAg loss rates (OR: 12.65, 95% CI: 1.58-101.51) but carries moderate risks of virologic relapse (OR: 47.17, 95% CI: 2.79-797.35) and clinical flares. PICO 4 analyses on several cohort studies showed that in patients co-infected with HCV, HBV, or HIV, the annual incidence of HCC was higher than the level where screening becomes cost-effective, suggesting that regular liver cancer screening could be beneficial for these patients.

[CONCLUSIONS] Despite low certainty, the findings support shared decision-making in high-risk horizontal transmission scenarios or in treating individuals in the immune tolerance phase, caution in discontinuing antiviral therapy in virologically suppressed individuals without HBsAg loss, and tailored HCC surveillance for those with co-infection or cirrhosis.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Antiviral Agents; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Hepatitis B virus; Coinfection; DNA, Viral; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B e Antigens