The role of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in colon cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials.
메타분석
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
4575 patients (2244 in the CME + CVL group and 2331 in the non-CME + CVL group).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that CME with CVL significantly improves long-term oncological outcomes in patients with colon cancer, without compromising short-term postoperative outcomes. CME with CVL may represent an optimal surgical strategy for the management of colon cancer.
[BACKGROUND] The concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been introduced as a surgical technique for colon cancer.
- 연구 설계 systematic review
APA
Kitaguchi D, Forgione A, et al. (2026). The role of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in colon cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 52(4), 111516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111516
MLA
Kitaguchi D, et al.. "The role of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in colon cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials.." European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 52, no. 4, 2026, pp. 111516.
PMID
41774976 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] The concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been introduced as a surgical technique for colon cancer. Nonetheless, the precise significance of CME and CVL in improving outcomes remains a subject of ongoing debate. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials is to compare postoperative and oncological outcomes between CME with CVL and surgery without the concept of CME + CVL in patients with colon cancer.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A systematic literature search and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate both postoperative and oncological outcomes. Postoperative outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate to open surgery, intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Oncological outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and the cumulative incidence of recurrence and death.
[RESULTS] A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, including six randomized controlled trials and five prospective clinical trials, comprising a total of 4575 patients (2244 in the CME + CVL group and 2331 in the non-CME + CVL group). Pooled analyses demonstrated significantly improved DFS and OS in the CME + CVL group, with no significant heterogeneity across studies. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative outcomes, including morbidity and mortality.
[CONCLUSIONS] This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that CME with CVL significantly improves long-term oncological outcomes in patients with colon cancer, without compromising short-term postoperative outcomes. CME with CVL may represent an optimal surgical strategy for the management of colon cancer.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A systematic literature search and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate both postoperative and oncological outcomes. Postoperative outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate to open surgery, intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Oncological outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and the cumulative incidence of recurrence and death.
[RESULTS] A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, including six randomized controlled trials and five prospective clinical trials, comprising a total of 4575 patients (2244 in the CME + CVL group and 2331 in the non-CME + CVL group). Pooled analyses demonstrated significantly improved DFS and OS in the CME + CVL group, with no significant heterogeneity across studies. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative outcomes, including morbidity and mortality.
[CONCLUSIONS] This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that CME with CVL significantly improves long-term oncological outcomes in patients with colon cancer, without compromising short-term postoperative outcomes. CME with CVL may represent an optimal surgical strategy for the management of colon cancer.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for Colon Cancer.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative and oncological outcomes between local excision plus radiotherapy versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.
- Early local immune activation following intra-operative radiotherapy in human breast tissue.