Cautious reappraisal of full thickness local excision in early-stage rectal cancer: When less is not more.
The management of early-stage rectal cancer continues to evolve, with increasing emphasis on organ preservation and treatment personalisation.
APA
Bunjo Z, Sammour T (2026). Cautious reappraisal of full thickness local excision in early-stage rectal cancer: When less is not more.. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 28(4), e70459. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.70459
MLA
Bunjo Z, et al.. "Cautious reappraisal of full thickness local excision in early-stage rectal cancer: When less is not more.." Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 28, no. 4, 2026, pp. e70459.
PMID
42003441
Abstract
The management of early-stage rectal cancer continues to evolve, with increasing emphasis on organ preservation and treatment personalisation. Full thickness local excision (LE) is commonly employed in cT1N0 cancer as a relatively low-morbidity method to risk stratify patients as having low-risk pT1 disease, high-risk pT1 disease or pT2+ disease depending on depth of invasion as well as other features such as lymphovascular invasion and tumour budding. This risk stratification as part of a 'two-stage' approach helps guide whether surveillance is safe or completion therapy is required. However, the morbidity of LE is frequently overlooked, including its impact on definitive completion therapy. In this article, we summarise the current role of LE in early rectal cancer and highlight concerns surrounding the morbidity and oncological risks of full thickness LE. We conclude with a proposed contemporary algorithm for managing early-stage rectal cancer that is patient-centred but optimises for oncological safety.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Proctectomy; Risk Assessment; Algorithms; Rectum; Neoplasm Invasiveness