본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Breast Cancer Risk in over 1.3 Million Women on Antipsychotic Therapy: Life-Saving Drugs or Hidden Trigger for Breast Cancer?

메타분석 2/5 보강
Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 1/1 OA 2023: 2/2 OA 2025: 13/13 OA 2026: 38/38 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.14(2) OA Schizophrenia research and treatment
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-29
OpenAlex 토픽 · Schizophrenia research and treatment Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Giusto EA, Oteri V, Guido G, Bogdan DA, Giuliani J, Giorgi C

📖 무료 전문 🔓 OA PDF oa
📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Antipsychotic (AP) medications are widely prescribed beyond psychotic disorders, yet their long-term safety profile regarding breast cancer (BC) risk remains uncertain.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Enrico Altiero Giusto, Vittorio Oteri, et al. (2026). Breast Cancer Risk in over 1.3 Million Women on Antipsychotic Therapy: Life-Saving Drugs or Hidden Trigger for Breast Cancer?. Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020205
MLA Enrico Altiero Giusto, et al.. "Breast Cancer Risk in over 1.3 Million Women on Antipsychotic Therapy: Life-Saving Drugs or Hidden Trigger for Breast Cancer?." Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 2, 2026.
PMID 42029629 ↗

Abstract

Antipsychotic (AP) medications are widely prescribed beyond psychotic disorders, yet their long-term safety profile regarding breast cancer (BC) risk remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the association between AP exposure and incident BC. Eligible studies reported adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals for any AP, prolactin-increasing antipsychotics (PIAPs), or prolactin-sparing antipsychotics (PSAPs). Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (mNOS), and certainty of evidence was graded with the GRADE framework. Random-effect models were used to pool effect estimates by exposure category, duration, and cumulative Defined Daily Dose (DDD). Nine high-quality observational studies encompassing 108 effect estimates were included. Most studies achieved mNOS scores of 9, yet GRADE certainty ranged from very low to moderate, with the overall body of evidence graded as low certainty due primarily to residual confounding. Any AP exposure was associated with a modestly increased BC risk, particularly with long-term use: use for >5 years yielded pooled ORs around 1.5-1.6, while short-to-medium duration (1-5 years) showed smaller increases (pooled ORs in the range 1.2-1.3). For PIAPs, both longer duration (>5 years) and higher cumulative exposure (>1000-2000 DDDs) were consistently associated with ORs/HRs in the 1.3-1.6 range, suggesting a possible dose-response pattern. Histological analyses indicated stronger associations for ductal than lobular BC, and elevated risks were observed across age strata, including women aged <55 and ≥70 years. This meta-analysis suggests that chronic exposure to prolactin-increasing antipsychotics is associated with a potentially clinically relevant increase in BC risk, whereas prolactin-sparing agents do not show a clear signal of harm. However, the certainty of this association is limited by inconsistently measured confounders and by the observational nature of the data. These findings support a cautious, individualized approach in which clinicians preferentially consider PSAPs when appropriate, discuss BC risk as part of shared decision-making, and integrate tailored screening strategies for women requiring long-term PIAP therapy. Further high-quality pharmacoepidemiologic studies with better confounder control and mechanistic integration are needed to refine risk estimates and inform preventive neuropsychopharmacology.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🔓 OA PDF 열기