본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Mechanism-based nutritional approaches in cancer cachexia.

3/5 보강
Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care 2026 Vol.29(3) p. 246-252 cited 1 Nutrition and Health in Aging
TL;DR In chronic pancreatitis, EUS remains central when cross-sectional imaging is equivocal; secretin-stimulated endoscopic pancreatic function testing can complement morphology, although discordant results limit standalone certainty.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-04-29
OpenAlex 토픽 · Nutrition and Health in Aging Muscle Physiology and Disorders Cancer Research and Treatments

Cappellato EE, Costelli P, Penna F

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

In chronic pancreatitis, EUS remains central when cross-sectional imaging is equivocal; secretin-stimulated endoscopic pancreatic function testing can complement morphology, although discordant result

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Emma Elisabeth Cappellato, P. Costelli, Fabio Penna (2026). Mechanism-based nutritional approaches in cancer cachexia.. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 29(3), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001207
MLA Emma Elisabeth Cappellato, et al.. "Mechanism-based nutritional approaches in cancer cachexia.." Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, vol. 29, no. 3, 2026, pp. 246-252.
PMID 41496391

Abstract

[PURPOSE OF REVIEW] Cancer cachexia is a complex multiorgan wasting syndrome that negatively impacts on cancer patient's survival and quality of life. Standard nutritional support is considered insufficient to counteract cachexia, and no approved nutritional approach or standard of care for cachexia exists so far. This review highlights recent reports focused on nutrition, aimed at sparing skeletal muscle and targeting molecular pathways underlying cachexia with specific supplements.

[RECENT FINDINGS] In animal models of cancer cachexia, branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) help restore skeletal muscle proteostasis. In combination with the alanine dipeptide, with strong proteinogenic potential, BCAAs enhance anabolic signaling and suppress proteolysis via mTOR. α-ketoisocaproate exerts additional protective effects against muscle loss by targeting the Akt/FoxO3a and myostatin signaling. Methionine and the derivative SAM improve muscle status via epigenetic control and REDD1 suppression. L-carnitine shows multitarget functions, including muscle proteostasis control, inflammation attenuation, and reduced muscle fibrosis. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids show anti-inflammatory properties, improve the nutritional status, and prevent adipose tissue browning.

[SUMMARY] Overall, recent findings in preclinical and partly in clinical studies indicate that nutrient-based interventions target complementary cancer cachexia alterations. It is likely that combinatorial approaches, integrating several specific nutrients, will provide an effective base for managing cancer patients during the long journey of the disease, building future interventions against cancer cachexia.

MeSH Terms

Cachexia; Humans; Neoplasms; Animals; Muscle, Skeletal; Dietary Supplements; Amino Acids, Branched-Chain; Nutrition Therapy; Nutritional Status; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Nutritional Support