Reconsidering adjuvant and perioperative immune-checkpoint inhibition: de-escalation, expansion and personalization.
2/5 보강
TL;DR
This Review examines de-escalation strategies, including shortening treatment duration or deferring therapy to time of recurrence, at which point anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more likely to be administered in combination; the expansion of certain specific indications, potentially leading to more effective combinations and/or use in biomarker-defined patients with high-risk early-stage disease.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
This Review examines de-escalation strategies, including shortening treatment duration or deferring therapy to time of recurrence, at which point anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more likely to be admin
APA
Douglas B. Johnson, Amin H. Nassar, et al. (2026). Reconsidering adjuvant and perioperative immune-checkpoint inhibition: de-escalation, expansion and personalization.. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 23(5), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-026-01123-4
MLA
Douglas B. Johnson, et al.. "Reconsidering adjuvant and perioperative immune-checkpoint inhibition: de-escalation, expansion and personalization.." Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, vol. 23, no. 5, 2026, pp. 341-355.
PMID
41708831 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
Anti-PD-L1 antibodies have transformed cancer treatment and are increasingly being used in patients with early-stage malignancies including in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. In certain cancers, earlier administration of these agents reduces the risk of metastatic disease and might improve overall survival. Thus far, however, overall survival benefits in the adjuvant setting have yet to be clearly demonstrated in all tumour types probably owing to a lack of long-term follow-up and/or the confounding effects of anti-PD-L1 antibody monotherapy and/or combinations in the metastatic setting, in which these agents can also produce durable responses. In this Review, we explore the optimal use of anti-PD-L1 antibodies in the adjuvant and perioperative settings, using examples from melanoma, renal cell carcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. We examine de-escalation strategies, including shortening treatment duration or deferring therapy to time of recurrence, at which point anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more likely to be administered in combination; the expansion of certain specific indications, potentially leading to more effective combinations and/or use in biomarker-defined patients with high-risk early-stage disease; and selecting the most appropriate indication, with emerging data suggesting that neoadjuvant or perioperative use of anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more effective than adjuvant use in certain cancers, as well as the possibility of personalization of therapy guided by biomarkers such as circulating tumour DNA or other emerging assays.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.