본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Reconsidering adjuvant and perioperative immune-checkpoint inhibition: de-escalation, expansion and personalization.

2/5 보강
Nature reviews. Clinical oncology 📖 저널 OA 9.3% 2023: 1/1 OA 2024: 0/3 OA 2025: 0/8 OA 2026: 3/31 OA 2023~2026 2026 Vol.23(5) p. 341-355 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
TL;DR This Review examines de-escalation strategies, including shortening treatment duration or deferring therapy to time of recurrence, at which point anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more likely to be administered in combination; the expansion of certain specific indications, potentially leading to more effective combinations and/or use in biomarker-defined patients with high-risk early-stage disease.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-04-29
OpenAlex 토픽 · Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Immunotherapy and Immune Responses Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments

Johnson DB, Nassar AH, Aijaz A, Knight A, Zerey MM, Rini BI

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

This Review examines de-escalation strategies, including shortening treatment duration or deferring therapy to time of recurrence, at which point anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more likely to be admin

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Douglas B. Johnson, Amin H. Nassar, et al. (2026). Reconsidering adjuvant and perioperative immune-checkpoint inhibition: de-escalation, expansion and personalization.. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 23(5), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-026-01123-4
MLA Douglas B. Johnson, et al.. "Reconsidering adjuvant and perioperative immune-checkpoint inhibition: de-escalation, expansion and personalization.." Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, vol. 23, no. 5, 2026, pp. 341-355.
PMID 41708831 ↗

Abstract

Anti-PD-L1 antibodies have transformed cancer treatment and are increasingly being used in patients with early-stage malignancies including in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. In certain cancers, earlier administration of these agents reduces the risk of metastatic disease and might improve overall survival. Thus far, however, overall survival benefits in the adjuvant setting have yet to be clearly demonstrated in all tumour types probably owing to a lack of long-term follow-up and/or the confounding effects of anti-PD-L1 antibody monotherapy and/or combinations in the metastatic setting, in which these agents can also produce durable responses. In this Review, we explore the optimal use of anti-PD-L1 antibodies in the adjuvant and perioperative settings, using examples from melanoma, renal cell carcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. We examine de-escalation strategies, including shortening treatment duration or deferring therapy to time of recurrence, at which point anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more likely to be administered in combination; the expansion of certain specific indications, potentially leading to more effective combinations and/or use in biomarker-defined patients with high-risk early-stage disease; and selecting the most appropriate indication, with emerging data suggesting that neoadjuvant or perioperative use of anti-PD-L1 antibodies might be more effective than adjuvant use in certain cancers, as well as the possibility of personalization of therapy guided by biomarkers such as circulating tumour DNA or other emerging assays.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반