본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA as a baseline or dynamic factor in advanced NSCLC without oncogenic drivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 3/5 보강
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 📖 저널 OA 5.3% 2022: 0/3 OA 2023: 0/2 OA 2024: 0/4 OA 2025: 0/56 OA 2026: 15/236 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.221() p. 105226 cited 1 OA Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
TL;DR Plasma ctDNA shows consistent prognostic value, though clinical implementation is limited by methodological variability, and its dynamics during treatment was strongly prognostic for poor survival.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-04-29
OpenAlex 토픽 · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Lung Cancer Research Studies

Andersen ME, Hedegaard EM, Wen SWC, Callesen LB, Szejniuk WM, Ladekarl M, Timm S, Spindler KG, Frank MS

📖 무료 전문 🔓 OA PDF oa
📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Plasma ctDNA shows consistent prognostic value, though clinical implementation is limited by methodological variability, and its dynamics during treatment was strongly prognostic for poor survival.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 1.40-1.87
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA M.E. Andersen, E.M. Hedegaard, et al. (2026). Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA as a baseline or dynamic factor in advanced NSCLC without oncogenic drivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 221, 105226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105226
MLA M.E. Andersen, et al.. "Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA as a baseline or dynamic factor in advanced NSCLC without oncogenic drivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.." Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, vol. 221, 2026, pp. 105226.
PMID 41724339 ↗

Abstract

Prognostic biomarkers for advanced non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review assessed the prognostic value of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline and its dynamics during treatment. Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched to February 27, 2025, identifying studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS). Bias was evaluated using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and publication bias with funnel plots and Egger's regression. Among 7118 records, 43 studies were included, spanning diverse designs, ctDNA assays, quantification units, and definitions of dynamic change. Detectable or elevated baseline ctDNA was associated with worse OS (HR 1.62; 95 % CI 1.40-1.87) with substantial heterogeneity and possible small-study bias. Increasing or persistent ctDNA during treatment was strongly prognostic for poor survival (HR 2.69; 95 % CI 2.35-3.09). Overall study quality was moderate to high. Plasma ctDNA shows consistent prognostic value, though clinical implementation is limited by methodological variability.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🔓 OA PDF 열기