What Is the Optimum Timing of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Two-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction: Radiation to the Tissue Expander or Permanent Implant?

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2015 Vol.135(6) p. 1509-1517

Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hudis CA, Hu Q, Heerdt A, Matros E

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Postmastectomy radiotherapy is increasingly common for patients with advanced breast cancer. The optimal timing and sequence of mastectomy, reconstruction, and radiotherapy remains unresolved for patients choosing immediate two-stage prosthetic reconstruction.

[METHODS] Long-term outcomes were compared for all patients with prosthetic-based reconstruction without radiation, radiation to the tissue expander, or to the permanent implant from 2003 to 2012 performed by the senior author (P.G.C.). Surgeon-evaluated outcomes included reconstructive failure, aesthetic results, and capsular contracture. Odds of failure with radiotherapy at different times were evaluated with logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the BREAST-Q.

[RESULTS] A total of 1486 reconstructions without radiation, 94 reconstructions with tissue expander radiation, and 210 reconstructions with permanent implant radiation were included. Six-year predicted failure rates were greater for patients with tissue expander radiation than for patients with permanent implant radiation (32 percent versus 16.4 percent; p < 0.01). Patients undergoing radiation to the tissue expander had a greater proportion of very good to excellent aesthetic results compared to patients with permanent implant radiation (75.0 percent versus 67.6 percent; p < 0.01) and lower rates of grade IV capsular contracture (p < 0.01). BREAST-Q scores were similar for patients with the different radiation timings.

[CONCLUSIONS] Although the risk of reconstructive failure is significantly higher for patients with tissue expander radiation compared to patients with permanent implant radiation, the aesthetic results and capsular contracture rates are slightly better. Patient reported outcomes do not differ between patients with tissue expander or permanent implant radiation.

[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 3
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 3
해부 Tissue scispacy 1
해부 prosthetic-based scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Postmastectomy scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 breast cancer C0006142
Malignant neoplasm of breast
scispacy 1
질환 contracture C0009917
Contracture
scispacy 1
질환 grade IV capsular contracture scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 tissue expander scispacy 1
기타 capsular scispacy 1
기타 Patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Aged; Analysis of Variance; Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Care Facilities; Chi-Square Distribution; Cohort Studies; Esthetics; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Mastectomy; Middle Aged; New York City; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Failure; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; Tissue Expansion Devices; Treatment Outcome

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문