Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon.
[BACKGROUND] The last two decades have seen significant changes in surgical management of breast cancer.
- 추적기간 9.98 months
APA
Jafferbhoy S, Chandarana M, et al. (2017). Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon.. Gland surgery, 6(6), 682-688. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.07.07
MLA
Jafferbhoy S, et al.. "Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon.." Gland surgery, vol. 6, no. 6, 2017, pp. 682-688.
PMID
29302486
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The last two decades have seen significant changes in surgical management of breast cancer. The offer of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy is currently standard practice. Skin sparing and nipple sparing mastectomy with implant-based IBR have emerged as oncologically safe treatment options. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage of implant with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) eliminates the need to detach the muscle from underlying chest wall in contrast to the subpectoral technique. We report short-term outcomes of a multicentre study from the United Kingdom (UK) using Braxon in women having an IBR.
[METHODS] A prospective study was conducted from December 2015 to October 2016 and included all patients from three breast units in the UK who underwent a mastectomy and an implant-based IBR using Braxon. The demographic details, co-morbidities, operative details, immediate and delayed complications were recorded. Specific complications recorded were infection, seroma, unplanned readmission and loss of implant. A comparison was made with complications reported in the National Mastectomy and Reconstruction Audit.
[RESULTS] Seventy-eight IBRs were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 9.98 months. Mean age of the cohort was 50 years with a mean body mass index of 25.7 kg/m. Mean implant volume was 365 cc. The inpatient hospital stay was 1.48 days. About 23% of patients had a seroma, 30% had erythema requiring antibiotics and the explant rate was 10.2 percent. Bilateral reconstructions were significantly associated with implant loss and peri-operative complications on univariate analysis.
[CONCLUSIONS] Our early experience with this novel prepectoral technique using Braxon has shown it to be an effective technique with complication rates comparable to subpectoral IBR. The advantages of prepectoral implant-based IBR are quicker postoperative recovery and short post-operative hospital stay. Long-term studies are required to assess rippling, post-operative animation, capsular contracture and impact of radiotherapy.
[METHODS] A prospective study was conducted from December 2015 to October 2016 and included all patients from three breast units in the UK who underwent a mastectomy and an implant-based IBR using Braxon. The demographic details, co-morbidities, operative details, immediate and delayed complications were recorded. Specific complications recorded were infection, seroma, unplanned readmission and loss of implant. A comparison was made with complications reported in the National Mastectomy and Reconstruction Audit.
[RESULTS] Seventy-eight IBRs were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 9.98 months. Mean age of the cohort was 50 years with a mean body mass index of 25.7 kg/m. Mean implant volume was 365 cc. The inpatient hospital stay was 1.48 days. About 23% of patients had a seroma, 30% had erythema requiring antibiotics and the explant rate was 10.2 percent. Bilateral reconstructions were significantly associated with implant loss and peri-operative complications on univariate analysis.
[CONCLUSIONS] Our early experience with this novel prepectoral technique using Braxon has shown it to be an effective technique with complication rates comparable to subpectoral IBR. The advantages of prepectoral implant-based IBR are quicker postoperative recovery and short post-operative hospital stay. Long-term studies are required to assess rippling, post-operative animation, capsular contracture and impact of radiotherapy.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 4 | |
| 합병증 | seroma
|
장액종 | dict | 2 | |
| 기법 | subpectoral
|
근막하 평면 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | Skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | muscle
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | prepectoral
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | erythema
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | infection
|
감염 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | capsular contracture
|
피막구축 | dict | 1 | |
| 재료 | acellular dermal matrix
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 1 | |
| 재료 | adm
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | Braxon
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] Seventy-eight IBRs
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breast cancer
|
C0006142
Malignant neoplasm of breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Prepectoral implant
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | readmission
|
C4489276
Readmission
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | erythema
|
C0041834
Erythema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | implant loss
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | contracture
|
C0009917
Contracture
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | IBR
→ immediate breast reconstruction
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nipple
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | wall
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | women
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | prepectoral implant-based IBR
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | capsular
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- The Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination: A Scoping Review.