Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2024 Vol.153(2) p. 281e-290e

Talwar AA, Lanni MA, Ryan IA, Kodali P, Bernstein E, McAuliffe PB, Broach RB, Serletti JM, Butler PD, Fosnot J

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive approach after mastectomy. Prepectoral implants offer advantages over submuscular implants, such as less animation deformity, pain, weakness, and postradiation capsular contracture. However, clinical outcomes after prepectoral reconstruction are debated. The authors performed a matched-cohort analysis of outcomes after prepectoral and submuscular reconstruction at a large academic medical center.

[METHODS] Patients treated with implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy from January of 2018 through October of 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were propensity score exact matched to control demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative differences. Outcomes assessed included surgical-site occurrences, capsular contracture, and explantation of either expander or implant. Subanalysis was done on infections and secondary reconstructions.

[RESULTS] A total of 634 breasts were included (prepectoral, 197; submuscular, 437). A total of 292 breasts were matched (146 prepectoral:146 submuscular) and analyzed for clinical outcomes. Prepectoral reconstructions were associated with greater rates of SSI (prepectoral, 15.8%; submuscular, 3.4%; P < 0.001), seroma (prepectoral, 26.0%; submuscular, 10.3%; P < 0.001), and explantation (prepectoral, 23.3%; submuscular, 4.8%; P < 0.001). Subanalysis of infections revealed that prepectoral implants have shorter time to infection, deeper infections, and more Gram-negative infections, and are more often treated surgically (all P < 0.05). There have been no failures of secondary reconstructions after explantation in the entire population at a mean follow-up of 20.1 months.

[CONCLUSIONS] Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher rates of infection, seroma, and explantation compared with submuscular reconstructions. Infections of prepectoral implants may need different antibiotic management to avoid explantation. Secondary reconstruction after explantation can result in long-term success.

[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
기법 submuscular 근막하 평면 dict 9
해부 breast 유방 dict 4
합병증 seroma 장액종 dict 2
합병증 infection 감염 dict 2
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 2
해부 prepectoral scispacy 1
해부 breasts scispacy 1
합병증 prepectoral implants scispacy 1
합병증 ssi 감염 dict 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Implant-based scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Prepectoral implant-based breast scispacy 1
질환 pain C0030193
Pain
scispacy 1
질환 surgical-site scispacy 1
질환 infections C0851162
Infections of musculoskeletal system
scispacy 1
질환 breasts C0006141
Breast
scispacy 1
질환 Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction scispacy 1
기타 Submuscular Implant-Based scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 capsular scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Mastectomy; Breast Implantation; Retrospective Studies; Breast Neoplasms; Seroma; Mammaplasty; Breast Implants; Contracture

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문