A Closer Look at Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Direct-to-Implant versus 2-Stage Outcomes.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2026 Vol.157(3) p. 322e-331e

Amro C, Ryan IA, Ewing JN, Gala Z, Lemdani MS, Talwar AA, Broach RB, Fosnot J, Serletti JM, Fischer JP

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction offers several advantages over the 2-stage implant-based breast reconstruction approach. However, the outcomes of prepectoral reconstruction are debated. Many previous studies contained confounders, making their conclusions less definitive. This study offers the first matched cohort analysis comparing DTI with 2-stage reconstruction in the prepectoral plane.

[METHODS] Patients treated with postmastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction from 2018 through 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were propensity score matched by body mass index, smoking status, history of hypertension, mastectomy type, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, acellular dermal matrix use, and coverage type. Outcomes assessed included surgical site occurrences (SSOs), capsular contracture, and explantation of either expander or implant.

[RESULTS] A total of 433 breasts were identified, and 154 breasts were matched (77 DTI; 77 2-stage). Two-stage prepectoral reconstruction was associated with greater rates of seromas (2-stage, 18.2%; DTI, 5.2% [ P < 0.05]) and overall SSOs (2-stage, 45.5%; DTI, 24.7% [ P < 0.05]). This approach was also an independent predictor on multivariate regression (adjusted odds ratio, 5.69, 4.86 [ P < 0.05]). There were no differences between the groups regarding final implant size, capsular contraction (grades 3 or 4), or implant or expander loss ( P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in secondary reconstruction or failures of secondary reconstructions after explantation between the groups, with a mean follow-up of 22 months.

[CONCLUSIONS] Prepectoral 2-stage and DTI reconstruction have similar risk profiles; however, DTI may be more beneficial in the correctly identified patient. Prepectoral 2-stage reconstruction is associated with higher rates of seromas and SSOs compared with DTI reconstruction. Secondary reconstruction after explantation can readily achieve long-term success in both prepectoral 2-stage and DTI reconstruction.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 3
해부 prepectoral scispacy 1
해부 breasts scispacy 1
해부 capsular scispacy 1
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 1
재료 acellular dermal matrix 무세포진피기질 dict 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Direct-to-implant scispacy 1
약물 SSOs → surgical site occurrences scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Prepectoral scispacy 1
질환 hypertension C0020538
Hypertensive disease
scispacy 1
질환 seromas C0262627
Seroma
scispacy 1
질환 expander loss scispacy 1
질환 Prepectoral 2-stage scispacy 1
질환 DTI → Direct-to-implant scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 capsular scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy; Postoperative Complications; Matched-Pair Analysis; Adult; Propensity Score; Treatment Outcome; Pectoralis Muscles; Aged

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문