Comprehensive Analysis of Full Coverage Versus Anterior Tenting Techniques for ADM Application in Prepectoral DTI Breast Reconstruction.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is currently the most widely used implant-based reconstruction method, which often utilizes an acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted approach. There are two primary methods for applying ADM: full coverage of the implant and anterior tenting, where only the front is covered. Despite the widespread use of these techniques, comprehensive studies comparing their outcomes are lacking. This study aimed to conduct a thorough head-to-head comparison of the outcomes of the two methods.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We reviewed patients who underwent prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction with ADM between January 2021 and April 2022. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the preference of the attending surgeon: full coverage and anterior tenting. Postoperative complications and esthetic outcomes were compared and analyzed.
[RESULTS] A total of 304 patients (363 cases) were analyzed: 295 in the full-coverage group and 68 in the anterior tenting group. The baseline characteristics were generally similar between the two groups. Overall complications did not show significant differences, whereas the capsular contracture rate was significantly lower and detected later in the full-coverage group, which remained significant even after adjusting for other factors, including radiotherapy. The esthetic scores were similar between the groups; however, rippling was significantly less frequently observed in the anterior tenting group.
[CONCLUSIONS] Our findings indicate that both methods of applying the ADM yield comparable outcomes, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Selection of an appropriate method based on a specific situation can lead to optimal outcomes.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We reviewed patients who underwent prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction with ADM between January 2021 and April 2022. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the preference of the attending surgeon: full coverage and anterior tenting. Postoperative complications and esthetic outcomes were compared and analyzed.
[RESULTS] A total of 304 patients (363 cases) were analyzed: 295 in the full-coverage group and 68 in the anterior tenting group. The baseline characteristics were generally similar between the two groups. Overall complications did not show significant differences, whereas the capsular contracture rate was significantly lower and detected later in the full-coverage group, which remained significant even after adjusting for other factors, including radiotherapy. The esthetic scores were similar between the groups; however, rippling was significantly less frequently observed in the anterior tenting group.
[CONCLUSIONS] Our findings indicate that both methods of applying the ADM yield comparable outcomes, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Selection of an appropriate method based on a specific situation can lead to optimal outcomes.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | adm
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 5 | |
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | Anterior
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | prepectoral DTI
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | capsular contracture
|
피막구축 | dict | 1 | |
| 재료 | acellular dermal matrix
|
무세포진피기질 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | 304
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Prepectoral
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Prepectoral DTI Breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | anterior tenting
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | full-coverage
|
scispacy | 1 |
📑 인용 관계
이 논문이 참조한 문헌 35
- Impact of polyurethane versus acellular dermal matrix coating on prepectoral reconstruction outcomes…
- A Comparative Study of Wraparound versus Anterior Coverage Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix in P…
- Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and met…
- A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilizatio…
- Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
- Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, squ…
- Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Mes…
- Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
- A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
- Comparative Study of Meshed and Nonmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction…
- Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Fenestrated Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Novel Design.
- A Guide to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A New Dimension to Implant-based Breast Reconstruction…
- Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage.
- Further evidence that human acellular dermal matrix decreases inflammatory markers of capsule format…
- Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results af…
- The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: a review of the evidence.
- Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix…
- The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model.
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- The Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination: A Scoping Review.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.