Long-Term Outcomes of Arm Replantation.

Annals of plastic surgery 2020 Vol.84(3S Suppl 2) p. S151-S157

Wang C, Askari M, Zhang F, Lineaweaver WC

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Advances in microsurgery have improved the survival rate of arm replantation. However, the functional outcome of the replanted arms remains unpredictable. The authors performed a systematic review to evaluate the long-term outcome of arm replantation and the secondary reconstructive procedures after replantation.

[METHODS] All available English literature in the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was searched for articles reporting functional outcome of successful arm replantation with follow-up period more than 1 yr. Clinical data were extracted including study characteristics, patient demographic information, functional outcome, and the numbers, types, and timing of secondary surgery. Among these, factors identified to influence overall outcome were reviewed and analyzed.

[RESULTS] Twenty-nine studies representing 79 arm replantations met the inclusion criteria. A total of 111 secondary procedures were recorded in 23 studies. The average number of secondary surgical procedures was 2.6 per patient. The most common procedures were nerve repair (23.4%), followed by functioning muscle transfer (19.8%), tendon transfer (17.1%), wound coverage (11.7%), contracture release (10.8%), bone repair (9.9%), arthrodesis (5.4%), and others (1.8%). Procedures involving wound coverage and nerve repair were mainly conducted in the early stage within 4 mos after replantation, whereas functioning muscle transfer, tendon transfer, and arthrodesis were mostly performed after 1 yr postoperatively. The satisfied (Chen I and II) functional outcome was achieved in 49.4% patients. The level of amputation and the type of injury have significant impact on final outcomes, whereas patients' age and timing of nerve repair do not. Patients with amputation at the distal third of the arms had a better outcome than those at the proximal and middle third of the arms (P < 0.05), and patients injured by sharp-cut recovered better than those by crush and avulsion (P < 0.05).

[CONCLUSIONS] Optimal outcomes could be achieved in nearly half of patients with arm replantation, although multiple secondary surgical interventions and long periods of recovery are often required.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 1
해부 arm scispacy 1
해부 muscle scispacy 1
해부 tendon scispacy 1
해부 bone scispacy 1
해부 nerve scispacy 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
합병증 tendon scispacy 1
약물 Arm scispacy 1
약물 Embase scispacy 1
질환 replantations C0035139
Surgical Replantation
scispacy 1
질환 contracture C0009917
Contracture
scispacy 1
질환 arthrodesis C0003881
Arthrodesis
scispacy 1
질환 amputation C0002688
Amputation
scispacy 1
질환 crush and avulsion scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amputation, Traumatic; Arm; Female; Humans; Male; Microsurgery; Middle Aged; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Replantation; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문