본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Efficacy of microsurgery in treatment of localized or multiple gingival recession: A systematic review.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 3/3 OA 2022: 5/5 OA 2024: 1/1 OA 2025: 5/5 OA 2026: 3/3 OA 2021~2026 2021 Vol.11(2) p. 237-244
Retraction 확인
출처

Goyal L, Chawla K

📖 무료 전문 🟢 PMC 전문 PMC7903135

관련 도메인

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] To address the clinical question whether microsurgery hold an advantage in terms of clinical and patient oriented outcome over conventional macrosurgical procedures in the treatment of gin

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Goyal L, Chawla K (2021). Efficacy of microsurgery in treatment of localized or multiple gingival recession: A systematic review.. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research, 11(2), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.02.004
MLA Goyal L, et al.. "Efficacy of microsurgery in treatment of localized or multiple gingival recession: A systematic review.." Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, pp. 237-244.
PMID 33665073 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To address the clinical question whether microsurgery hold an advantage in terms of clinical and patient oriented outcome over conventional macrosurgical procedures in the treatment of gingival recession.

[MATERIAL AND METHODS] A Literature search on MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database) via Ovid and Cochrane library was conducted in order to investigate clinical studies on efficacy of microsurgery in the treatment of localized or multiple gingival recession as compared to conventional macrosurgical procedures. Publications before May 2020 and grey literature was searched without any language restrictions. Primary outcome considered was change in recession depth and mean root coverage. Whereas, change in clinical attachment level, Change in keratinized tissue, patient oriented outcome like esthetics, pain and discomfort were the secondary outcome. Based on inclusion criteria ten studies were included in systematic review. Data was extracted and analyzed.

[RESULTS AND CONCLUSION] All the included studies showed improvement in the mean percentage of root coverage or mean root coverage (primary outcome) when microsurgical approach was used. Predictability of complete root coverage is better with microsurgical instrumentation but results are not statistically significant. As far as patient centered outcome is concerned, there is no evidence for recommendation of microsurgery.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

전체 NER 표 보기
유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 4
해부 gingival scispacy 1
해부 tissue scispacy 1
해부 root scispacy 1
약물 [MATERIAL AND METHODS] A scispacy 1
약물 SCOPUS scispacy 1
약물 EMBASE scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS AND scispacy 1
질환 pain C0030193
Pain
scispacy 1

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

📖 비슷한 OA 논문 — 같은 카테고리, 무료 전문 가능

🟢 PMC 전문 열기