The Influence of Closing the Abdominal Donor-Site Superficial Fascial System in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2021 Vol.148(3) p. 357e-364e

Johnson AC, King BBT, Colakoglu S, Yang JH, Chong TW, Mathes DW

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The superficial fascial system is routinely closed to alleviate tension at the abdominal donor site after harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) for breast reconstruction. This is thought to decrease rates of wound dehiscence and improve contour postoperatively. There has been no comparative analysis on closure of the superficial fascial system and its effect on donor-site outcomes.

[METHODS] The authors retrospectively evaluated outcomes of DIEP flap breast reconstructions performed between 2017 and 2019. After May of 2018, the surgeons collectively agreed to stop closure of the superficial fascial system. All subsequent patients underwent closure of rectus abdominis fascia followed by skin closure. Patient demographic data and abdominal donor-site comorbidities were recorded between the superficial fascial system closure and no-superficial fascial system closure groups. Representative photographs of patients from the two groups were blindly assessed for scar appearance and contour using previously published grading scales. The results were compared.

[RESULTS] DIEP flap breast reconstruction was performed in 103 consecutive women. Among patients with abdominal donor-site reconstruction, 66 had superficial fascial system closure and 37 did not. There was not a significant difference in fat necrosis or wound dehiscence between the two groups (p = 0.29 and p = 0.39, respectively). Postoperative abdominal scar and contour were evaluated by 10 independent raters and showed no significant difference between the two groups.

[CONCLUSION] Omission of superficial fascial system closure resulted in no difference in wound dehiscence or fat necrosis rates and aesthetic appearance of the abdominal scar and contour.

[CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic, III.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 4
합병증 wound dehiscence 상처열개 dict 3
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 2
시술 diep flap 피판재건술 dict 2
합병증 necrosis 괴사 dict 2
해부 DIEP → deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap scispacy 1
해부 skin scispacy 1
해부 abdominal scispacy 1
해부 no-superficial fascial scispacy 1
해부 fat scispacy 1
합병증 abdominal donor scispacy 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
합병증 scar scispacy 1
합병증 abdominal scar scispacy 1
합병증 Superficial Fascial scispacy 1
합병증 Deep Inferior scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] The scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] DIEP flap breast scispacy 1
질환 DIEP → deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap C2985549
DIEP Flap
scispacy 1
질환 dehiscence C0149663
Dehiscence
scispacy 1
질환 DIEP flap breast reconstructions scispacy 1
기타 superficial fascial scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 rectus abdominis fascia scispacy 1
기타 Patient scispacy 1
기타 women scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Epigastric Arteries; Fat Necrosis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Length of Stay; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Perforator Flap; Rectus Abdominis; Retrospective Studies; Subcutaneous Tissue; Surgical Wound Dehiscence; Transplant Donor Site

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문