Dangle Protocols in Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

The Journal of surgical research 2021 Vol.266() p. 77-87

Lee ZH, Ramly EP, Alfonso AR, Daar DA, Kaoutzanis C, Kantar RS, Thanik V, Saadeh PB, Levine JP

관련 도메인

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Dangling protocols are known to vary by surgeon and center, and their specific regimen is often largely based on single surgeon or institutional experience. A systematic review was conducted to derive evidence-based recommendations for dangling protocols according to patient-specific and flap-specific considerations.

[METHODS] A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase-OVID and Cochrane-CENTRAL. Study design, patient and flap characteristics, protocol details, dangling-related complications, and flap success rate were recorded. Studies were graded using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Scale. Data heterogeneity precluded quantitative analysis.

[RESULTS] Eleven articles were included (level of evidence (range):IIb-IV; N (range):8-150; age (range):6-89). Dangling initiation, time, and frequency varied considerably. Flap success rate ranged from 94 to 100%. Active smoking, diabetes, and hypertension are associated with characteristic physiologic changes that require vigilance and potential protocol modification. Early dangling appears to be safe across a variety of free flap locations, sizes, and indications. Axial fasciocutaneous flaps may tolerate more aggressive protocols than muscular flaps. While flaps with single venous anastomosis tolerate dangling, double venous or flow-through anastomoses may provide additional benefit. Major limitations included small sample sizes, uncontrolled study designs, and heterogeneous patient selection, dangling practices, monitoring methods, and outcome measures.

[CONCLUSIONS] Significant heterogeneity persists in postoperative dangling protocols after lower extremity microvascular reconstruction. Patient comorbidities and flap characteristics appear to affect tolerance to dangling. We propose two different standardized pathways based on risk factors. Clinical vigilance should be exercised in tailoring lower extremity protocols to patients' individual characteristics and postoperative course.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 5
시술 free flap 피판재건술 dict 1
시술 microvascular 미세수술 dict 1
합병증 flaps scispacy 1
약물 [INTRODUCTION] Dangling scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 Dangle scispacy 1
질환 flap-specific scispacy 1
질환 diabetes C0011847
Diabetes
scispacy 1
질환 hypertension C0020538
Hypertensive disease
scispacy 1
질환 lower extremity microvascular reconstruction scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1
기타 fasciocutaneous flaps scispacy 1
기타 muscular flaps scispacy 1
기타 venous scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Clinical Protocols; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Lower Extremity; Microsurgery; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Vascular Surgical Procedures

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문