Comparison of management approaches in deep-seated intracranial arteriovenous malformations: Does treatment improve outcome?

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 2021 Vol.92() p. 191-196

Patel J, Feghali J, Yang W, Rapaport S, Gami A, Sattari SA, Tamargo RJ, Caplan JM, Huang J

관련 도메인

Abstract

Deep-seated intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) represent a subset of AVMs characterized by variably reported outcomes regarding the risk of hemorrhage, microsurgical complications, and response to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We aimed to compare outcomes of microsurgery, SRS, endovascular therapy, and conservative follow-up in deep-seated AVMs. A prospectively maintained database of AVM patients (1990-2017) was queried to identify patients with ruptured and unruptured deep-seated AVMs (extension into thalamus, basal ganglia, or brainstem). Comparisons of hemorrhage-free survival and poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] > 2) were performed between conservative management, microsurgery (±pre-procedural embolization), SRS (±pre-procedural embolization), and embolization utilizing multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses controlling for univariable factors with p < 0.05. Of 789 AVM patients, 102 had deep-seated AVMs (conservative: 34; microsurgery: 6; SRS: 54; embolization: 8). Mean follow-up time was 6.1 years and did not differ significantly between management groups (p = 0.393). Complete obliteration was achieved in 49% of SRS patients. Upon multivariable analysis controlling for baseline rupture with conservative management as a reference group, embolization was associated with an increased hazard of hemorrhage (HR = 6.2, 95%CI [1.1-40.0], p = 0.037), while microsurgery (p = 0.118) and SRS (p = 0.167) provided no significant protection from hemorrhage. Controlling for baseline mRS, microsurgery was associated with an increased risk of poor outcome (OR = 9.2[1.2-68.3], p = 0.030), while SRS (p = 0.557) and embolization (p = 0.541) did not differ significantly from conservative management. Deep AVMs harbor a high risk of hemorrhage, but the benefit from intervention Remains uncertain. SRS may be a relatively more effective approach if interventional therapy is indicated.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 5
해부 endovascular scispacy 1
해부 basal ganglia scispacy 1
합병증 intracranial arteriovenous scispacy 1
합병증 AVMs → arteriovenous malformations scispacy 1
약물 thalamus, scispacy 1
질환 intracranial arteriovenous malformations C0007772
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformation
scispacy 1
질환 AVMs → arteriovenous malformations C0003857
Congenital arteriovenous malformation
scispacy 1
질환 hemorrhage C0019080
Hemorrhage
scispacy 1
질환 SRS → stereotactic radiosurgery C3846112
Radiosurgery, Stereotactic
scispacy 1
질환 AVM C0003857
Congenital arteriovenous malformation
scispacy 1
질환 unruptured scispacy 1
질환 rupture C3203359
Rupture
scispacy 1
질환 deep-seated intracranial arteriovenous malformations scispacy 1
질환 deep-seated AVMs scispacy 1
질환 AVM patients scispacy 1
질환 brainstem scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Embolization, Therapeutic; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문