본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Microsurgical training with chicken wings: Could it be an option to increase experience for vascularized bone flaps?

Injury 2022 Vol.53(2) p. 422-426

Pamuk Ç

관련 도메인

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] To our knowledge, a vascularized bone flap training model has not been described in the literature.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Pamuk Ç (2022). Microsurgical training with chicken wings: Could it be an option to increase experience for vascularized bone flaps?. Injury, 53(2), 422-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.054
MLA Pamuk Ç. "Microsurgical training with chicken wings: Could it be an option to increase experience for vascularized bone flaps?." Injury, vol. 53, no. 2, 2022, pp. 422-426.
PMID 35000743

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To our knowledge, a vascularized bone flap training model has not been described in the literature. In this study, we hypothesized that chicken wing radius bone can be used as a cheap, realistic and easily accessible vascularized pedicled bone flap training model.

[METHODS] A final total of 10 specimens were included in the study. All procedures were planned and conducted by the same surgeon. In all 10 specimens, the length of the radius bone and the length of the vascularized bone flap were measured with a standard ruler. The external diameters of the ulnar artery and the radial artery forming the flap pedicle were measured.

[RESULTS] Flap harvesting time (40.4 ± 7.98') was measured as the time between proper positioning of the chicken wing and the complete separation of the flap from the wing. Mean radius bone length was 6.09 ± 0.72 cm, bone flap length (3.92 ± 0.36 cm) was measured as the distance between two osteotomies in the maximum length of bone (proximal and distal) according to the preparation of the radial artery pedicle. Mean radial artery pedicle external diameter was 0.51 ± 0.05 mm, while mean ulnar artery pedicle external diameter was 0.6 ± 0.04 mm. On average, 4.3 ± 0.82 perforators of the radial artery (to the other regions of the flap) were ligated.

[CONCLUSION] We think that this model can be a pioneer in defining the bone flap model in living animals in future studies. Since this inanimate animal model is a cost-effective and easily accessible technique, it offers the opportunity to be applied easily and repeatedly, even in the comfort of surgeons' homes.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 9
해부 bone scispacy 1
해부 perforators scispacy 1
합병증 flap pedicle scispacy 1
합병증 wing scispacy 1
약물 ± 7.98') scispacy 1
약물 ± 0.82 perforators of the radial artery scispacy 1
질환 specimens scispacy 1
기타 chicken scispacy 1
기타 bone flaps scispacy 1
기타 bone flap scispacy 1
기타 chicken wing radius bone scispacy 1
기타 ulnar artery scispacy 1
기타 artery scispacy 1
기타 chicken wing scispacy 1
기타 artery pedicle scispacy 1
기타 ulnar artery pedicle scispacy 1
기타 radial artery scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Animals; Chickens; Radial Artery; Radius; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surgical Flaps; Ulnar Artery

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)

관련 논문