Accuracy of digitally planned, guided apicoectomy with a conventional trephine and a custom-made endodontic trephine: An in vitro comparative study.

[PURPOSE] Static guided trephine apicoectomy has been developed as a less invasive and more accurate alternative to conventional freehand apicoectomy with drills. Overpenetration is a frequent issue with this procedure, which deteriorates accuracy and raises safety concerns. A safety improvement to address this problem is presented.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Guided apicoectomies were performed in porcine mandibles with either a conventional bone trephine or a custom-made endo-trephine with built-in depth control. The deviation of the apical endpoint of the trephine from the digital surgical plan was analyzed. Overpenetration frequency was recorded.

[RESULTS] Procedures performed with the custom trephine were significantly more accurate both along the x-axis and globally, but no significant difference was found for the y and z axes. Overpenetration frequency was 70% in the conventional trephine group versus 38% in the stop trephine group.

[CONCLUSION] The results indicate that the lack of physical depth control can interfere with the accuracy (and safety) of these procedures to a significant extent, as visual cues (such as the depth markings on a conventional trephine) are insufficient to prevent overpenetration. Our results show that custom-made trephines with a built-in stop offer an optimal solution for this problem.